In the six days since I set up the poll on
URL: http://doodle.com/xbmswycmsahy6qwp , 19 entries have been
added. 14 (74%) have a Raspberry Pi available, while 7 (37%) have a
Dreamplug available. Only 19 entries make me suspsect not many people
are reading this list regularly. :)
--
Happy
On Wed, Oct 16, 2013 at 09:04:59AM +0200, Petter Ericson wrote:
On 16 October, 2013 - Petter Reinholdtsen wrote:
In the six days since I set up the poll on
URL: http://doodle.com/xbmswycmsahy6qwp , 19 entries have been
added. 14 (74%) have a Raspberry Pi available, while 7 (37%) have a
The page where the poll was supposed to be was impossible to get on. I have
Raspberry Pi available.
On Oct 16, 2013, at 8:58 AM, Petter Reinholdtsen wrote:
In the six days since I set up the poll on
URL: http://doodle.com/xbmswycmsahy6qwp , 19 entries have been
added. 14 (74%) have a
On 10/16/2013 06:33 AM, Anders Andersson wrote:
The page where the poll was supposed to be was impossible to get on. I have
Raspberry Pi available.
On Oct 16, 2013, at 8:58 AM, Petter Reinholdtsen wrote:
In the six days since I set up the poll on
URL: http://doodle.com/xbmswycmsahy6qwp , 19
A lot of my friends have one or more Raspberry Pi machines, and I even
got one myself too. But no-one I know nearby own a Dreamplug. This
tell me that the availability of the Debian based Freedombox reference
platform is low, and I believe this limit the number of people joining
the project.
A
On 2013-10-10 at 11:26:49 +0200, Petter Reinholdtsen wrote:
One unsolved issue might be the need for non-free firmware, but I am
not sure if any such firmware is needed for the use cases we have in
the Freedombox.
The raspberry-pi requires non-free software for booting: it is simply
This is also possible
1 TP - home server and internet router using PPPOE
On Thu, 2013-10-10 at 11:26 +0200, Petter Reinholdtsen wrote:
2 TP - home server and internet router
___
Freedombox-discuss mailing list
On Thu, Oct 10, 2013 at 11:26:49AM +0200, Petter Reinholdtsen wrote:
A lot of my friends have one or more Raspberry Pi machines, and I even
got one myself too. But no-one I know nearby own a Dreamplug. This
tell me that the availability of the Debian based Freedombox reference
platform is
[Eugen Leitl]
A successor the the very popular PCEngines ALIX
http://www.pcengines.ch/alix.htm system
is in the works: http://www.pcengines.ch/apu.htm
That would seem to be another potential hardware target.
The point I am trying to make is that we should focus on hardware
available
Quoting Eugen Leitl (2013-10-10 12:58:48)
On Thu, Oct 10, 2013 at 11:26:49AM +0200, Petter Reinholdtsen wrote:
A lot of my friends have one or more Raspberry Pi machines, and I
even got one myself too. But no-one I know nearby own a Dreamplug.
This tell me that the availability of the
On Thu, Oct 10, 2013 at 01:06:14PM +0200, Petter Reinholdtsen wrote:
The point I am trying to make is that we should focus on hardware
available already with a lot of users. The fact that there is other
The Raspberry is a nice device, but it looks a bit anaemic
in terms of hardware specs.
It
Hello.
Den 10 okt 2013 13:33 skrev Eugen Leitl eu...@leitl.org:
On Thu, Oct 10, 2013 at 01:06:14PM +0200, Petter Reinholdtsen wrote:
The point I am trying to make is that we should focus on hardware
available already with a lot of users. The fact that there is other
The Raspberry is a
[Jonas Smedegaard]
Listed at https://wiki.debian.org/FreedomBox/TargetedHardware#Unsuitable
It sure is. What was the reason you added dropped Raspberry Pi from
the wiki 2013-08-13 21:35:37 and added it back under the Unsuitable
heading 2013-08-18 00:04:41? Was there some mailing list
Hi Anders,
Quoting Anders Jackson (2013-10-10 13:53:56)
Den 10 okt 2013 13:33 skrev Eugen Leitl [1]eu...@leitl.org:
On Thu, Oct 10, 2013 at 01:06:14PM +0200, Petter Reinholdtsen wrote:
hardware around (or soon to be available) that is nicher and more
powerful and less dependend on non-free
[Anders Jackson]
But do we need to even talk hardware this much? If done right, as
long we have Debian running on a machine should we be able to run
Freedombox on it. And Rasbian should be enough Debian to run
Freedombox, without (large) software problems.
I bring it up because I have
Quoting Petter Reinholdtsen (2013-10-10 14:08:09)
[Jonas Smedegaard]
Listed at https://wiki.debian.org/FreedomBox/TargetedHardware#Unsuitable
It sure is. What was the reason you added dropped Raspberry Pi from
the wiki 2013-08-13 21:35:37 and added it back under the Unsuitable
heading
[Jonas Smedegaard]
Uhm - in what way is the reason not obvious from the resulting wiki
page and the commit messages for those changes?
The reasoning seem to be based on assumtion that are non-obvious to
me. The first part Requires non-free blob to boot seem quite
similar to any PC with a
Jonas Smedegaard d...@jones.dk writes:
Main problem, considering it as *reference* platform, is the non-free
blobs needed to boot. Also a problem if using unofficial packages.
iirc they were going to put the blobs in a rom chip, but i can't find
the announcement right now.
--
On Thu, 2013-10-10 at 11:26 +0200, Petter Reinholdtsen wrote:
A way to tap into the resource of people already owning an Raspberry
Pi and interested in taking back control over their own computer use
and communication needs, would be to announce that Raspberry Pi will
also be a reference
Quoting Tim Retout (2013-10-10 23:31:24)
Now, I have always heard Bdale talk about the Debian-based Freedombox
as a reference implementation, implying to me that other groups
would build different compatible Freedombox software implementations
(e.g. Freedombox on Fedora, which afaik doesn't
20 matches
Mail list logo
