Hi Josh (and others),
Quoting Stefan Monnier (2017-12-02 04:03:36)
>> I was on https://wiki.debian.org/CheapServerBoxHardware and I noticed
>> that the Cubieboard3 was recomended, but the Cubieboard5 wasn't. Why
>> is this? Why was the Cubieboard5 deemed " possibly using less than
>> ideal
> I was on https://wiki.debian.org/CheapServerBoxHardware and I noticed
> that the Cubieboard3 was recomended, but the Cubieboard5 wasn't. Why is
> this? Why was the Cubieboard5 deemed " possibly using less than ideal
> components or wiring for essential parts" while the Cubieboard3 was not?
I was on https://wiki.debian.org/CheapServerBoxHardware and I noticed
that the Cubieboard3 was recomended, but the Cubieboard5 wasn't. Why is
this? Why was the Cubieboard5 deemed " possibly using less than ideal
components or wiring for essential parts" while the Cubieboard3 was not?
Josh