While I would prefer if you worked in the open I do have some suggestions
on what other things/frameworks/ideas people have some what recently been
doing with containers and container like things for 'application deployment'.
Hi Leen,
I will release a demo as soon as possible. Once the demo
[Petter Reinholdtsen]
Hi. When I combine the freedombox-privoxy deb source from
URL: https://github.com/NickDaly/freedom-maker/tree/master/source/sourcecode
with the upstream tarball from
URL: ftp://ftp.uio.no/debian/pool/main/p/privoxy/privoxy_3.0.19.orig.tar.gz
(renamed to
On 7 Oct 2013 10:58, Petter Reinholdtsen p...@hungry.com wrote:
Is the complete silence on this issue an indicator that no-one is
maintaining the freedombox-privoxy package any more? If so, what should
the project do about it?
Yes, I suspect this is
the case.
I have been looking at the rules
Just came across http://enigmabox.net/ which is a commercial
project using cjdns/Hyperboria for transport and offers end to
end encrypted VoIP and operates http (and more?) exits.
The hardware seems to be PCEngines ALIX. It doesn't ship
with Tor, but Tor can be used with it. Don't see any open
On 7 Oct 2013 13:19, I wrote:
As for what we do about it, I am not sure.
Actually, I have an opinion: plinth/freedom-maker should be set up to use
the normal Debian privoxy package. This lets development continue while we
figure out if/how to move the freedombox-specific rules upstream.
Tim
I love the name.
But wouldn't it have to be open source to be trusted, considering what it
is?
On Mon, Oct 7, 2013 at 10:50 AM, Eugen Leitl eu...@leitl.org wrote:
Just came across http://enigmabox.net/ which is a commercial
project using cjdns/Hyperboria for transport and offers end to
end
Hi Leen,
Hi Rob,
Good that you are aware of the other solutions.
I guess we'll have to wait on what you come up with. :-)
Rob.
http://freedomboxblog.nl
___
Freedombox-discuss mailing list
Freedombox-discuss@lists.alioth.debian.org
On Mon, Oct 07, 2013 at 01:15:55PM -0400, Rick wrote:
I love the name.
But wouldn't it have to be open source to be trusted, considering what it
is?
I'll try pinging the devs. I doubt the setup is much different from a
basic functional cjdns node.
On Mon, Oct 7, 2013 at 10:50 AM, Eugen
