Hi!
2-Апр-2004 19:02 [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Aitor Santamari'a Merino) wrote to
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:
>> DOS doesn't places command name into PSP, only rest of command line.
>>Command name (executable name and path) starting from DOS 3.x you may find
>>after regular environment.
ASM> Oops, it seems y
Hi!
2-Апр-2004 14:20 [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Alain) wrote to
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:
A> What about puting somwhere an APTR (Arkady's patchews to Rbil)? He just
A> said in a message that hes has his own collection
A> do you agree, Arkady?
I think, my list is far not so complete, as list, collected by
On Fri, 02 Apr 2004 14:15:25 -0300, Alain wrote:
Do you have it handy to send it back to me? I hava a dos version program
and I do have a rom-dos and I would like to test it.
Here it is, from my old archives (when I was a Linux man using ROM-DOS and
FreeDOS was DOS/C):
Can an application tell t
P.S. Under what license was the RBIL released? What about an ABIL
(Arkady Belousov's Interrupt List)? ;-)
What about puting somwhere an APTR (Arkady's patchews to Rbil)? He just
said in a message that hes has his own collection
do you agree, Arkady?
Alain
---
Hi Lucho.
There is also one other for DR-DOS and something (which I don't know)
for Datalife-ROM-DOS.
Right. I posted the ROM-DOS one at the kernel mailing list last year.
Do you have it handy to send it back to me? I hava a dos version program
and I do have a rom-dos and I would like to test it
Hi,
This is to announce a revision of DISPLAY 0.10, namely DISPLAY 0.10b.
It just fixes a couple of bugs:
- a bug that assumed a space to lead the parameter
- a bug affecting the DISPLAY Installation check function (AD00h in int2Fh)
MODECON.EXE also disappears from the distribution: please always
Hi Arkady and Tom (and thanks),
Arkady V.Belousov escribio':
ASM> As in my understanding what it's there is a fully qualified program name
DOS doesn't places command name into PSP, only rest of command line.
Command name (executable name and path) starting from DOS 3.x you may find
after reg
Hello Aitor,
ASM> Some time ago, it was mentioned that there is a bug in FreeCOM's
ASM> implementation of LOADHIGH (or in LH), by which, in my understanding, no
ASM> space was left in the commandline between the program name and the
ASM> parameters.
ASM> This revealed that I am assuming in DISPLAY
On Fri, 2 Apr 2004 10:35:34 +0100 (BST), Bart Oldeman wrote:
http://marc.theaimsgroup.com/?l=freedos-dev&m=103714414728398&w=2
In the above message, Alain suggests the same he does now, yet there is no
change during the last 2 years. So as I see, to insist to change anything
here is useless and
On Fri, 2 Apr 2004, Luchezar Georgiev wrote:
> On Thu, 1 Apr 2004 21:46:29 +0100 (BST), Bart Oldeman wrote:
>
> > I sent this to Ralf Brown at the time that Matthias Paul did a desperate
> > call for updates because RBIL62 could be released any day (that was in
> > April 2002),
>
> On 1st of April
10 matches
Mail list logo
