Hello Arkady,
5. MS-command.com places its (resized) segment with environment right after
itself (original segment preserved not freed), FreeCOM places environment
into UMB, but, as I understand, with LAST_FIT.
I think, (5) should be changed (LAST_FIT to BEST_FIT).
I think (5) should
Hi!
27--2004 15:52 [EMAIL PROTECTED] (tom ehlert) wrote to Arkady V.Belousov
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:
5. MS-command.com places its (resized) segment with environment right after
itself (original segment preserved not freed), FreeCOM places environment
into UMB, but, as I understand, with
Hello Arkady,
5. MS-command.com places its (resized) segment with environment right after
itself (original segment preserved not freed), FreeCOM places environment
into UMB, but, as I understand, with LAST_FIT.
I think, (5) should be changed (LAST_FIT to BEST_FIT).
te I think (5) should
Hi!
27--2004 17:56 [EMAIL PROTECTED] (tom ehlert) wrote to Arkady V.Belousov
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:
In this case memory will be allocated in the _best_ segment (shortest,
which may fit) or after command.com (as with MS-DOS), if there is no
fragmentation.
te one more hint: command.com swaps
Hi!
Found one more issue in the FD-DEBUG: if inspect INT23 and INT24
vectors inside FD-DEBUG, then there is NULL. Consequently, INT 21/26 (make
new PSP) makes PSP with zero fileds for these interrupts.
---
This SF.Net email sponsored by
