Hi!
21--2004 06:02 [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Eric Auer) wrote to
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:
EA Hi, I wrote 2 tools which might be useful for the installer:
EA http://www.coli.uni-sb.de/~eric/stuff/soft/specials/
EA tiny-file-append-concat.zip
EA Usage: concat somefile.xyz will append the contents of
!
8--2004 19:52 [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Bernd Blaauw) wrote to
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:
BB MSDOS uses errlvl 1 for unformatted, and errlvl 12 is OK then.
BB However, I don't know code to implement it:
BB If errorlevel 16 goto skipwipe // don't format
BB If %errorlevel%'==1 format c: // unformatted, msdos
Eric Auer schreef:
In addition, OSCHECK searches the boot sector for typical kernel file names.
When such a string is found, OSCHECK looks for the corresponding file on disk.
Both on-screen messages and returned errorlevels give you detailled information
about which FORMAT/SYS tool was probably
Hi,
The recent distribution of FreeDOS is very well done and very stable in my
first try-outs. I can still remember the days where I would curse the entire
thing to hell, just a some years ago. It's a very OS now!
But in just some minutes of installing and configuring it, I have come
around some
Koder wrote:
Hi,
After a few years of being idle in the DOS-scene, I am looking to writing
some new apps. I am using Borland's TC 2.01 because that has been released
for free. Here are some questions for you dev's:
1) If I were to write a FreeDOS-targetted application on FreeDOS, which C++
Hi!
1) If I were to write a FreeDOS-targetted application on FreeDOS, which C++
compiler would be the most interesting? I have a copy of TC++ 3.0 lying
around somewhere. Is that one freely available yet?
Only TC 2.01 and TC++ 1.02 are free. And OpenWatcom! Quite big but seems
to be quite
Eric Auer wrote:
Hi!
1) If I were to write a FreeDOS-targetted application on FreeDOS, which C++
compiler would be the most interesting? I have a copy of TC++ 3.0 lying
around somewhere. Is that one freely available yet?
Only TC 2.01 and TC++ 1.02 are free. And OpenWatcom! Quite big but seems
to
Bernd Blaauw escribió:
still SYS should have some additional possibilities, like WARNING the
user.
I remember my SYS C:..while C: contained Win2000 bootloader..bye bye
Win2000 installation :(
A bit offtopic, well, I don't know much about the NT loader, but it
always surprised to me how fragile
Aitor Santamaría Merino schreef:
A bit offtopic, well, I don't know much about the NT loader, but it
always surprised to me how fragile is the whole installation of a
robust operating system like WinNT can be easily trashed in a few
seconds, by just SYS:-ing whenever it loads from an existing
Koder wrote:
Hi,
After a few years of being idle in the DOS-scene, I am looking to writing
some new apps. I am using Borland's TC 2.01 because that has been released
for free. Here are some questions for you dev's:
1) If I were to write a FreeDOS-targetted application on FreeDOS, which C++
10 matches
Mail list logo
