Michael Devore schreef:
Uploaded to ftp://ftp.devoresoftware.com/downloads/emm386 are the
files emmx208.zip, EMM386/HIMEM mostly executable package (EXEs
compressed via mutant UPX), and emms208.zip, EMM386/HIMEM mostly
source package. Nomyso version 2.0 was uploaded to
ftp://ftp.devoresoftwar
Uploaded to ftp://ftp.devoresoftware.com/downloads/emm386 are the files
emmx208.zip, EMM386/HIMEM mostly executable package (EXEs compressed via
mutant UPX), and emms208.zip, EMM386/HIMEM mostly source package. Nomyso
version 2.0 was uploaded to ftp://ftp.devoresoftware.com/downloads/nomyso
na
Johnson Lam schreef:
THE QUESTION is: I wish to add error level = 1 format terminated ok, but
floppy has bad sectors. Anyone has a comment about that?
You mean the new error level 1 is: format terminated successfully.
No. Format will in normal mode still behave the same as MS-FORMAT,
i
On Mon, 28 Nov 2005 17:01:34 -0200, you wrote:
Hi,
>MS-format errorlevels are
>0 =ok, ok with bad-sectors, sintax errors or help msg.
>3 =aborted by user
>4 =fatal error, disk broken or wrong name
>5 =harddisk format confirmation not given (user selected "no")
>outputs = 0, 3 and
After a long discussion of-list with Eric, now we wnat to make a general
discusion on the list abour FORMAT and error level.
The problem is that I want to detect if a formatd floppy has bad sectors
to be able show a big alert for the user (in automated batch mode with
/Z:SERIOUSLY)
MS-format
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hello Arkady
> AB> BUFFERSHIGH=29 -> 615kB conventional and 150kB upper memory free
> AB> BUFFERSHIGH=30 -> 599kB conventional and 150kB upper memory free
>
> This is not strange, because 29 buffers fit to remains of HMA, whereas
> 30 already not.
O
Ladislav Lacina wrote:
Hi!
I would like to know whether is there any diference between MSDOS and
FreeDOS behavior in TSR programs. Can I in TSRs call the same subset of DOS
funkcions like in MSDOS? Or more or less?
Can I read and write files from my TSRs?
The behaviour _should_ match MS-DOS i
On Mon, 28 Nov 2005, Ladislav Lacina wrote:
I would like to know whether is there any diference between MSDOS and
FreeDOS behavior in TSR programs. Can I in TSRs call the same subset of DOS
functions like in MSDOS? Or more or less?
We try to model MS DOS style as close as possible, so you can
Kenneth J. Davis wrote:
...
I may make patch sets or test binaries available at
http://www.fdos.org/kernel/test/ (or for short descriptions use
http://www.fdos.org/AuoIndex/index?dir=kernel/test/ )
:-)
Jeremy
sorry the above url should have a 't' in it, the correct one is:
http://www.fdos.
Hi!
I would like to know whether is there any diference between MSDOS and
FreeDOS behavior in TSR programs. Can I in TSRs call the same subset of DOS
funkcions like in MSDOS? Or more or less?
Can I read and write files from my TSRs?
---
This SF
On Mon, 28 Nov 2005 07:46:13 -0500, you wrote:
Hi Jeremy,
>the link is under the 'Developers' section on www.freedos.org labeled
>'Kernel/FreeCOM', but yes its easy enough to overlook (I'm always
>skipping past the 'Report bugs' link when I go to look over bug
>reports). I updated the lsm so
tom ehlert wrote:
...
I wrote that after spending a couple of successless minutes to locate
the kernel (or freecom) source, starting from www.freedos.org
just try software->base->kernel->kernel.lsm and you are either on a
dead link or on the same page again :(
www.fdos.org/kernel/
I know th
Hello Kenneth,
>> just a few cents:
>>
>> a) are human beings like me supposed to locate kernel sources ?
>>how about a link where one can download it without knowing where it
>>is ?
> they are in the same place they have been, on sourceforge cvs.
I wrote that after spending a couple of
13 matches
Mail list logo
