Hi!
14-Июн-2006 05:25 [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Blair Campbell) wrote to
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:
BC goxy now uses the current video page for setting the cursor position
BC +++ goxy.c 14 Jun 2006 05:25:06 - 1.4
BC +_AH = 0x0F;
BC +geninterrupt( 0x10 );
BC _AH = 0x02;
BC _DH = ( y
Well, if it's ever ported to OW, it's probably best to use inline
assembler anyways :-)
On 6/13/06, Arkady V.Belousov [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi!
14-Июн-2006 05:25 [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Blair Campbell) wrote to
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:
BC goxy now uses the current video page for setting the cursor
but those have more-or-less _become_ a standard for DOS users.
On 6/13/06, Arkady V.Belousov [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi!
13-Июн-2006 18:59 [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Blair Campbell) wrote to
freedos-devel@lists.sourceforge.net:
BC Basically, the OW is ok with the functions,as long as they are
BC
In case you haven't been paying attention, FreeCOM has gotten 3-4kb
smaller in the last week.
On 6/13/06, Johnson Lam [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi,
Last weekend I've discussed with BAHCL (PG's maintainer), we have a
concern that FreeCOM will growing too big, since it keep adding lots
of
Hi!
13-Июн-2006 23:35 [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Blair Campbell) wrote to
freedos-devel@lists.sourceforge.net:
BC Well, if it's ever ported to OW, it's probably best to use inline
BC assembler anyways :-)
BC +_AH = 0x0F;
BC +geninterrupt( 0x10 );
BC _AH = 0x02;
BC _DH = ( y - 1 );
Hi!
13-Июн-2006 22:26 [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Blair Campbell) wrote to
freedos-devel@lists.sourceforge.net:
BC but those have more-or-less _become_ a standard for DOS users.
BC Basically, the OW is ok with the functions,as long as they are
BC prepended with an underscore or something to prevent
Hi!
11-Июн-2006 20:12 [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Blair Campbell) wrote to
freedos-devel@lists.sourceforge.net:
BC +++ goxy.c 11 Jun 2006 02:47:05 - 1.3
BC - regs.h.dh = y - 1;
BC - regs.h.dl = x - 1;
BC + regs.r_dx = ( ( y - 1 ) 0xFF ) | ( ( x - 1 ) 8 );
Bug! Should be
Anyways, keep telling me where I go wrong :-). We all want
improvement. It just would be nice if (to me) the way of doing so
seemed nicer.
On 6/13/06, Arkady V.Belousov [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi!
12-Июн-2006 13:25 [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Blair Campbell) wrote to
Hi!
13-Июн-2006 14:17 [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Alain M.) wrote to
freedos-devel@lists.sourceforge.net:
AM it. I just believe there is no word in russioan for praise.
There is.
___
Freedos-devel mailing list
Freedos-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
Hi!
13-Июн-2006 14:59 [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Andreas Berger) wrote to
freedos-devel@lists.sourceforge.net:
AB me I was lying when I explained something he thought was inaccurate. Of
AB course he did not mean I was lying but that what I said was not totally
AB true (or was inaccurate). I guess that
On Tue, 13 Jun 2006 22:25:43 -0700, you wrote:
Hi Blair,
In case you haven't been paying attention, FreeCOM has gotten 3-4kb
smaller in the last week.
I know, actually I found the bug in your binary, but someone report
the bug faster than me so I keep silent.
Thanks for cleaning up the code, I
Hi!
13-Июн-2006 02:10 [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Blair Campbell) wrote to
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:
BC +++ prprompt.c 13 Jun 2006 02:10:19 - 1.7
BC void displayPrompt(const char *pr)
BCswitch (toupper(*++pr)) {
BC + case 'A': outc(''); break;
[...]
BC + case 'S': outc(' ');
Specifically, the // was introduced in the C99 spec:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/C_programming_language#C99
Blair Campbell wrote:
Well, the latest C standard says that // is a valid C source code
comment, so...
On 6/13/06, Aitor Santamaría [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
A slight commenr,
My 2c about that: FreeCOM compiles only with Borland, if it works, fine.
Maybe some day it will be ported to OW, it is good to keep that in
sight, which in this case is ok :)
Alain
Blair Campbell escreveu:
Well, the latest C standard says that // is a valid C source code
comment, so...
On
Johnson Lam escreveu:
I think everyone will appreciate Blair trying to help (of course
including Arkady), but personally I think Arkady personal standard
about coding is high, that's all
Yes they are. And I like that, he just sometimes over-optimizes, but
that is fine too :)
It's danger
Blair Campbell escreveu:
Basically, the OW is ok with the functions,as long as they are
prepended with an underscore or something to prevent pollution of the
namespace, so #defining __TURBOC_FUNCS__ would then be necessary to
use them.
Basicaly I wrote some screen functions. If anyone need
Lyrical Nanoha escreveu:
On the other hand DJGPP's runtime is mostly Borland-compatible. o.o So
while it's not as good for FreeDOS stuff being 32-bit, at least the
runtime works the same way.
DJGPP is not very good for programs like FreeCOM that use many dos far
pointers. That is very
About new functions, did the Ctrl+C functionality get included in FreeCOM?
Some people don't even know about it, but it is important (and very
simple): a single Ctrl+C at the beguining of a command line produces a
dos-disk-reset. This is partularly importand for floppy drivers that
don't
Arkady V.Belousov escreveu:
Perfect. (Except, that there used TC/BC-related extension, not portable
to other compilers.)
Ok, but we are linked with TC/BC anyway...
BTW, Andreas Berger knows how to do it in OW too. It is somewhat easyer
because it has inline assembler.
Alain
Arkady V.Belousov escreveu:
Of course. But difference is that for OW team Borland's names are less
de-facto standard, than for us.
IIRC, what happened is the when Borland abandoned DOS and went to
Windows, Watcom released a new version of C with all Borland functions
and that was when
Hi!
14-Июн-2006 17:17 [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Alain M.) wrote to
freedos-devel@lists.sourceforge.net:
Of course. But difference is that for OW team Borland's names are less
de-facto standard, than for us.
AM IIRC, what happened is the when Borland abandoned DOS and went to
AM Windows, Watcom
Hi!
14-Июн-2006 17:13 [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Alain M.) wrote to
freedos-devel@lists.sourceforge.net:
AM Ok, but we are linked with TC/BC anyway...
But we should break this tendency - in compare with OW, TC/BC have
(almost) no any advantage and no future.
AM BTW, Andreas Berger knows how to do
Arkady V.Belousov escreveu:
And this is one of the FreeCOM problems! And why _add_ more
incompatibilities, not eliminate them?!
You have a point there. But, in the case of *some* programs like
FreeCOM, there is no portability for a lot of other reasons.
IMHO, this is a case where it
Arkady V.Belousov escreveu:
AB me I was lying when I explained something he thought was inaccurate. Of
AB course he did not mean I was lying but that what I said was not totally
AB true (or was inaccurate). I guess that in russian the two meanings use
AB the same word.
No, these
Arkady V.Belousov escreveu:
AB Now the the real reason for the mail. Arkady said that the int*()
AB function do not pass on the flags correctly.
They do not do this at all.
Yes. it leaves it uninitialized! Which is dangerous. (happend to me)
AB Alain asked me to show the way that
Arkady V.Belousov escreveu:
Of course. But difference is that for OW team Borland's names are less
de-facto standard, than for us.
AM IIRC, what happened is the when Borland abandoned DOS and went to
AM Windows, Watcom released a new version of C with all Borland functions
AM and
AM Ok, but we are linked with TC/BC anyway...
AB But we should break this tendency - in compare with OW, TC/BC have
AB (almost) no any advantage and no future.
That is true. But in case of FreeCOM, it is too time consuming to
migrate because too many things were not thinked of
Hi!
14-Июн-2006 19:01 [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Alain M.) wrote to
freedos-devel@lists.sourceforge.net:
AB Now the the real reason for the mail. Arkady said that the int*()
AB function do not pass on the flags correctly.
They do not do this at all.
AM Yes. it leaves it uninitialized!
No,
HI Blair,
This is a nice discovery from Arkady: from his explanation below, intr()
has CY=1 for int 21h :)
Arkady, see below
Arkady V.Belousov escreveu:
AM Yes. it leaves it uninitialized!
No, CF state _always_ initialized, but initialization value depends
from (internal) code of
On Wed, 14 Jun 2006 16:53:13 -0300, you wrote:
Hi,
My 2c about that: FreeCOM compiles only with Borland, if it works, fine.
Maybe some day it will be ported to OW, it is good to keep that in
sight, which in this case is ok :)
I think it's pretty important that FreeCOM should be develop on a
On Wed, 14 Jun 2006 18:52:12 -0300, you wrote:
Hi Alain,
It's not a problem of having the words, really. It once happend here in
Brazil with my mother (who is Italian) in a meeting of french people
(her husband is French) and she used exactly this phrase: that is a
lye. She was almost banned
Arkady V.Belousov escreveu:
Of course. But difference is that for OW team Borland's names are
less
de-facto standard, than for us.
AM IIRC, what happened is the when Borland abandoned DOS and went to
AM Windows, Watcom released a new version of C with all Borland
32 matches
Mail list logo
