Re: [Freedos-devel] Compatibility EMM386/HIMEM 2.25 New Release

2006-08-20 Thread Aitor Santamaría
Hello Michael, Thanks for that good piece of work. Besides these late fixings, you did quite a lot of quite great follow-up to Tom's EMM386 (port to NASM / new UPX are my two favourite). All the best for whatever else you will be doing, in the times of WinXP+ I am afraid that technical thourough

Re: [Freedos-devel] Hopefully last testing distribution

2006-08-20 Thread Arkady V.Belousov
Hi! 19-Авг-2006 21:35 [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Blair Campbell) wrote to freedos-devel@lists.sourceforge.net: BC What config.c?? MLSinglestepping (F8) is: OFF Looks like there definitely lost my config.c, with MS-DOS-like startup screen look and feel. :( There is no your guilty -

Re: [Freedos-devel] Hopefully last testing distribution

2006-08-20 Thread tom ehlert
Hello Arkady, BC What config.c?? MLSinglestepping (F8) is: OFF Looks like there definitely lost my config.c, with MS-DOS-like startup screen look and feel. :( There is no your guilty - config.c is part of kernel. When I heavily rework it, fix many things (and, as usually, add

Re: [Freedos-devel] Compatibility EMM386/HIMEM 2.25 New Release

2006-08-20 Thread Arkady V.Belousov
Hi! 19-Авг-2006 18:28 [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Michael Devore) wrote to freedos-devel@lists.sourceforge.net: MD Uploaded to ftp://ftp.devoresoftware.com/downloads/emm386/ are the files MD emmx225.zip, EMM386 2.25 and HIMEM version 3.25 memory manager, mostly MD executable files; and emms225.zip,

Re: [Freedos-devel] Kernel 2037 actually available

2006-08-20 Thread Jim Hall
Blair Campbell wrote: Ok, I took the time to upload proper kernel pacakges to www.ibiblio.org/pub/micro/pc-stuff/freedos/files/dos/kernel/ as kernel2037-binary.zip and kernel2037-source.zip Enjoy PS: They contain Eric's QB 4.0 compatibility fix. Thanks, Blair! The fdkernel.lsm file

Re: [Freedos-devel] Compatibility EMM386/HIMEM 2.25 New Release

2006-08-20 Thread Aitor Santamaría
Hi, 2006/8/20, tom ehlert [EMAIL PROTECTED]: Hello Aitor, Thanks for that good piece of work. yes, indeed. Besides these late fixings, you did quite a lot of quite great follow-up to Tom's EMM386 (port to NASM / new UPX are my two favourite). my favorite is VDS and VCPI; port to

Re: [Freedos-devel] Compatibility EMM386/HIMEM 2.25 New Release

2006-08-20 Thread Bernd Blaauw
Aitor Santamari'a schreef: I haven't tried to compile it after the port to NASM, but I thought that was the trick. So how does this work? original sources -- some PERL(?) script -- nasm sources. run the script yourself, that's the challenge Michael has for us :) script is called NoMySo or

Re: [Freedos-devel] Compatibility EMM386/HIMEM 2.25 New Release

2006-08-20 Thread Arkady V.Belousov
Hi! 20-Авг-2006 20:00 [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Aitor Santamarэa) wrote to freedos-devel@lists.sourceforge.net: AS from you), but I wouldn't say that the port to NASM is negligible. Trick is, that sources are _not_ ported to NASM (explicitly). :) AS ? AS I haven't tried to compile it after the

Re: [Freedos-devel] Compatibility EMM386/HIMEM 2.25 New Release

2006-08-20 Thread Michael Devore
At 09:56 PM 8/20/2006 +0400, Arkady V.Belousov wrote: AS from you), but I wouldn't say that the port to NASM is negligible. Trick is, that sources are _not_ ported to NASM (explicitly). :) Took my machine about 1 minute to convert it, last I checked. FreeBSD apparently likes Nomyso best,

Re: [Freedos-devel] Compatibility EMM386/HIMEM 2.25 New Release

2006-08-20 Thread Arkady V.Belousov
Hi! 20-Авг-2006 20:24 [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Bernd Blaauw) wrote to freedos-devel@lists.sourceforge.net: BB script is called NoMySo or something. Not My Sources. Excerpt from build.txt: Build subsystem supports assembling by NASM and TASM and compilation by Turbo C 2.01, Turbo C++ 1.01,

Re: [Freedos-devel] Compatibility EMM386/HIMEM 2.25 New Release

2006-08-20 Thread Aitor Santamaría
Sorry, again my problems to acceed Michael's FTP (I wonder why, I've been using FileZilla, any user/pwwd so that I can try?). Could someone send it in private to this mail? Aitor 2006/8/20, Arkady V.Belousov [EMAIL PROTECTED]: Hi! 20-Авг-2006 20:24 [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Bernd Blaauw) wrote to

Re: [Freedos-devel] Compatibility EMM386/HIMEM 2.25 New Release

2006-08-20 Thread Arkady V.Belousov
Hi! 20--2006 14:15 [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Michael Devore) wrote to freedos-devel@lists.sourceforge.net: MD I needed to release 2.25 and you weren't available during that particular MD time period, I _was_ available. But I not see any letters from you in my postbox - so how you decide, that I

Re: [Freedos-devel] Compatibility EMM386/HIMEM 2.25 New Release

2006-08-20 Thread Michael Devore
At 12:03 AM 8/21/2006 +0400, Arkady V.Belousov wrote: MD I needed to release 2.25 and you weren't available during that particular MD time period, I _was_ available. But I not see any letters from you in my postbox - so how you decide, that I was not available? No, I based it on when you

Re: [Freedos-devel] Compatibility EMM386/HIMEM 2.25 New Release

2006-08-20 Thread Michael Devore
At 09:59 PM 8/20/2006 +0200, Aitor Santamaría wrote: That works, many thanks! Would EMM386 be in webspace too? (the obvious /emm386 didn't work) I'll stick in there somewhere after we make Arkady happy. Well, happier. -

Re: [Freedos-devel] Kernel 2037 actually available

2006-08-20 Thread Blair Campbell
You should probably ask Eric for the changes :-) On 8/20/06, Jim Hall [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Blair Campbell wrote: Ok, I took the time to upload proper kernel pacakges to www.ibiblio.org/pub/micro/pc-stuff/freedos/files/dos/kernel/ as kernel2037-binary.zip and kernel2037-source.zip

Re: [Freedos-devel] Hopefully last testing distribution

2006-08-20 Thread Eric Auer
Hi Blair, I did not check the updated htmlhelp (could some more documentation-oriented people have a look?), but I did test your new iso :-). As said in my earlier mail, most of the new changes are very nice, thanks :-). The install now works without any real problems - APART FROM the fact that

Re: [Freedos-devel] Hopefully last testing distribution

2006-08-20 Thread Aitor Santamaría
Hello Eric, 2006/8/21, Eric Auer [EMAIL PROTECTED]: - DISPLAY somehow manages to resist LOADHIGH, Aitor! Maybe it just tries to be too clever... Not at all. I remind you (discussed long ago) that it happens because of UPX. The creation of DISPLAY is: NASM = COM2EXE = UPX I must use UPX,