See mail archive few lines below or sf.net/projects/freedos
--
~~~ wow ~~~
--
Download Intel® Parallel Studio Eval
Try the new software tools for yourself. Speed compiling, find bugs
proactively, and fine-tune applicati
> No version message, no free-memory display, no "Welcome, thanks for
> trying FreeDOS!" message, nothing. Blank screen, C prompt. That is
> about as friendly as a kick in the nuts.
Agree, there is space for improvements.
> When I ran GEM, there were no links to any of this 150MB of programs.
Ba
> (Odd, in my day, DOS apps generally didn't have dependencies!)
Examples ??? AFAIK the only one is CWSDPMI (blame DGJPP, not FreeDOS ...)
> [1] I suggest removing the different memory configs as they will confuse
> novices
Agree, tuning EMS/UBM and legacy crap depending on such should be depre
I found it very interesting to install DOS onto a PC from CD-ROM -
this is something I've not done since Caldera gave me the sources for
DR-DOS 7.02 on CD-ROM!
I found the setup process a bit fraught, though. It seemed to me to be
far more complex than it needed to be.
For one thing, it seems to
Next I went looking through the config files.
Here I found the first problem.
There is a tool called "blackout" called repeatedly. I tried
HELP BLACKOUT
- not known.
I tried
BLACKOUT
- hung the PC. Ctrl-C didn't work, not Esc, not Ctrl-Break. Nothing quit it.
Reboot.
Try:
BLACKOUT /?
H
After installing 150MB of software - a /vast/ amount for DOS! - I got
a bare C:\> prompt at the end.
No version message, no free-memory display, no "Welcome, thanks for
trying FreeDOS!" message, nothing. Blank screen, C prompt. That is
about as friendly as a kick in the nuts.
Given that OpenGEM w
dos386 escreveu:
>
> some partially: [...] FDISK (patch pending),
If there is a patch, there should be a build?? Does anyone have
information on this?
Thanks,
Alain
--
Download Intel® Parallel Studio Eval
Try the new
Yes, for the moment it is all there is. We're working on some reported
bugs.
Pat
On Tue, Feb 23, 2010 at 5:31 AM, BuraphaLinux Server <
buraphalinuxser...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Is there a 1.1? I am under the impression that although 1.0 may be
> obsolete, it's all there is.
>
> JGH
>
> On 2/23/
Is there a 1.1? I am under the impression that although 1.0 may be
obsolete, it's all there is.
JGH
On 2/23/10, dos386 wrote:
>> Just wanted to ask if this was the right place to report or discuss
>
> Welcome :-)
>
>> comments, suggestions, bug reports &c in FreeDOS 1.0? I've just
>
> The 1.0 d
