Re: [Freedos-devel] FreeDOS development sense

2013-01-25 Thread Rugxulo
Hi, On Fri, Jan 25, 2013 at 4:42 AM, Евгений Нежданов wrote: > >> I think it's great that you have these programs (editor and BASIC >> interpreter) and are willing to share them under the GNU GPL. Where >> can people download these programs to try them out on FreeDOS? Do you >> have a website whe

Re: [Freedos-devel] FreeDOS development sense

2013-01-25 Thread Евгений Нежданов
> Compared to SETEDIT, your editor works on 8086. And compared > to our EDIT, your editor can probably handle bigger files... My editor handle files sizes of free memory in real more. > So yes, your GENTEXT is a good alternative. But if our EDIT > is unstable, please give a more detailed bug descri

Re: [Freedos-devel] FreeDOS development sense

2013-01-25 Thread Eric Auer
Hi Jevgenij, > I do not use Borland or other proprietary toolkit - I use my own > written window toolkit. Cool :-) >>> GENTEXT - multiwindow text editor, more stable but standard EDIT. >> Actually FreeDOS EDIT already is multiwindow, but limited >> in file size. For big files, an interesting ed

Re: [Freedos-devel] FreeDOS development sense

2013-01-25 Thread Евгений Нежданов
> Hi Jevgenij :-) Hi Eric. > That would probably be too annoying for people who want to > download DOS. But we could put a poll to the homepage, some > form saying "What do YOU use DOS for? Pick a choice to tell > us your DOS style: ..." or similar. The idea would be as on > https://isc.sans.edu/ w

Re: [Freedos-devel] FreeDOS development sense

2013-01-25 Thread Евгений Нежданов
> I think it's great that you have these programs (editor and BASIC > interpreter) and are willing to share them under the GNU GPL. Where > can people download these programs to try them out on FreeDOS? Do you > have a website where you make these programs available to others? I does currently not