Re: [Freedos-devel] FreeDOS 1.2 package compilation

2015-06-25 Thread Mercury Thirteen
Since it's not directly executable and the rest of the platform is 16-bit, I suppose there's no need for it to be included as well. -- Monitor 25 network devices or servers for free with OpManager! OpManager is web-based ne

Re: [Freedos-devel] FreeDOS 1.2 package compilation

2015-06-25 Thread Rugxulo
Hi, On Thu, Jun 25, 2015 at 1:28 PM, Mercury Thirteen wrote: > On Thu, Jun 25, 2015 at 6:03 AM, Thomas Mueller wrote: >> >> Is WATT-32 not included in the upcoming FreeDOS 1.2? Or is some part of >> WATT-32 (watt-32.net) not open-source? > > Wow, I forgot all about WATT-32. Actually, since it w

Re: [Freedos-devel] FreeDOS 1.2 package compilation

2015-06-25 Thread Mercury Thirteen
On Thu, Jun 25, 2015 at 6:03 AM, Thomas Mueller wrote: > ... > > Is WATT-32 not included in the upcoming FreeDOS 1.2? Or is some part of > WATT-32 (watt-32.net) not open-source? > > ... > Wow, I forgot all about WATT-32. Actually, since it was the official FreeDOS.org software list that I was w

Re: [Freedos-devel] FreeDOS 1.2 package compilation

2015-06-25 Thread Mercury Thirteen
On Wed, Jun 24, 2015 at 5:24 PM, Rugxulo wrote: > ... > > * CuteMouse needs fixing to avoid closed-source COM2EXE (already done > locally, but no response from maintainer) > * Jemm386 needs to remove JLOAD and similar closed-source pieces (no > maintainer) > * UIDE and XMGR from 2011? eh?? if we'

Re: [Freedos-devel] FreeDOS 1.2 package compilation

2015-06-25 Thread Thomas Mueller
I too would like to be able to install FreeDOS from a USB stick or from iso image that could be booted from Syslinux, Grub4DOS or GRUB2. I would likely install FreeDOS to USB stick. I don't know yet how FreeDOS 1.2 will boot; Syslinux has the advantage of being usable to boot other images/parti