That's exactly what I mean. I understand there is no such thing as a 32
or 16 bit package, per se, but the program inside will be one or the
other - or a "fat binary" containing both.
On 10/21/2015 11:19 PM, Ulrich Hansen wrote:
> Am 22.10.2015 um 00:19 schrieb Jerome E. Shidel Jr.
>
>> I keep s
Am 22.10.2015 um 00:19 schrieb Jerome E. Shidel Jr.
> I keep seeing everybody refer to 32-bit packages and FD(N)PKG.
> I don’t think using them alone would be keeping with what Jim
> desires for the OS
Did you take a look into the packages? If I understand it correctly these are
just zips wi
> On Oct 20, 2015, at 4:32 PM, Eric Auer wrote:
>
>
> Hi, at the risk of being controversial:
>
>>> I do know that the new version needs to support 16bit
>>> legacy systems.
>>
>> The installer certainly do. FDNPKG being 16bit sure would be "cool",
>> but I don't see it happening any time soo
> On Oct 21, 2015, at 9:42 AM, Mercury Thirteen wrote:
>
> On 10/21/2015 8:31 AM, Jerome E. Shidel Jr. wrote:
>> ...
>> Basically, the new installer uses a list of packages for BASE and ALL
>> binaries, and
>> a list for BASE and ALL sources.
>>
>> I did not know how the packages in 1.2 are go
I can help assemble the distro.
On Wed, Oct 21, 2015 at 9:42 AM, Mercury Thirteen
wrote:
> On 10/21/2015 8:31 AM, Jerome E. Shidel Jr. wrote:
> > ...
> > Basically, the new installer uses a list of packages for BASE and ALL
> binaries, and
> > a list for BASE and ALL sources.
> >
> > I did not k
On 10/21/2015 8:31 AM, Jerome E. Shidel Jr. wrote:
> ...
> Basically, the new installer uses a list of packages for BASE and ALL
> binaries, and
> a list for BASE and ALL sources.
>
> I did not know how the packages in 1.2 are going to be handled when it comes
> to
> source versus binary only. Wh
On 10/21/2015 12:45 AM, Mateusz Viste wrote:
> On 21/10/2015 02:32, Mercury Thirteen wrote:
>> Since the link Mateusz provided is complete and current, all one would
>> have to do is download all the package ZIPs and mesh them to the
>> installer, correct?
> That's correct. No need even to download
> On Oct 20, 2015, at 8:32 PM, Mercury Thirteen wrote:
>
> Jerome, perhaps you and I both can work together on this to make things
> go faster.
Thats a possible idea.
>
> Since the link Mateusz provided is complete and current, all one would
> have to do is download all the package ZIPs and