> Interesting you should mention this; I and a few others have been working on
> a
> 32-bit Protected Mode DOS-style kernel (see the Night group forum
> [here](https://groups.google.com/forum/?hl=en#!forum/night-dos-kernel) for
> more
> info) for a while now. While I never got too deep into DP
I, for one, would personally love to see FreeQB. Even if it only converted
BASIC to assembly and relied on NASM for compiling, it would be a welcome
addition to the FreeDOS family. The language could even be extended with
several features found in other BASICs, such as PowerBASIC. I began a BASI
Interesting you should mention this; I and a few others have been working on a
32-bit Protected Mode DOS-style kernel (see the Night group forum
[here](https://groups.google.com/forum/?hl=en#!forum/night-dos-kernel) for more
info) for a while now. While I never got too deep into DPMI (and theref
Hi. About 30 years ago, someone made a comment
on a group saying "until DOS is made 32-bit, DOS
extenders are just a kludge".
I didn't know much about DOS-specifics back then
to even understand the comment.
Microsoft abandoned the MSDOS API, but what
would a 32-bit version of the MSDOS API look
Hello, I have a few ideas.
FreeQB:
FreeQB is replacement for Microsoft QBASIC. FreeQB is
QBASIC.EXE for FreeDOS and compatible QBASIC. It may
run 8086 and low memory. This software may be written
write C++ and FDOSTUI Library.
FreeDOS Calculator:
A calculator for FreeDOS. This software may be
Thanks,
I will work for FreeDOS Coreutils.
Best regards,
Ercan
Good luck in your project!
I have a question: Did you write any code yet? I can only see the readme
and the license.
On Thu, Jul 5, 2018 at 7:36 AM, Ercan Ersoy mailto:ercaner...@ercanersoy.net>> wrote:
Hello,
I hav
