Hi Tom,
> can we please have a new version number please.
>
> instead of
>FreeCOM 0.84-pre5 prerelease beta 1
>
> FreeCOM 0.85 prerelease
That does not make much sense to me since 0.84 has not yet been released yet.
there is no beta1 (not sure where you read that, if it's there by
accident
Hi Eric,
On Thu, 16 Aug 2018 at 04:24, Eric Auer wrote:
> Could you tell more about the comResFile
> memory leak? Does it fix an old, elusive
> bug which has been on the list repeatedly?
no, it's not an old bug, it's related to getEnv("COMSPEC") using
dynamic pointers (since pre3) and the
Hi Bart,
can we please have a new version number please.
instead of
FreeCOM 0.84-pre5 prerelease beta 1
FreeCOM 0.85 prerelease
Tom
--
Check out the vibrant tech community on one of the world's most
engaging tech
> Thanks for your efforts, of course, but ... it's still got some
> bugs. The Watcom build runs faster (oddly),
could you please enlighten the rest of the universe in what way you
determined that 'The Watcom build runs faster'
> but my TESTS.BAT
' my TESTS.BAT' ? are we assumed to know
Excellent news!
El dom., 19 ago. 2018 a las 13:22, Ladislav Lacina ()
escribió:
> Great news for everyone :-)
>
> I accidentaly found that our beloved site www.bttr-software.de is back
> again (including the forum) since 18-august
>
> Thank you Robert Riebisch for this resurrection!
>
> Laaca
>
Great news for everyone :-)
I accidentaly found that our beloved site www.bttr-software.de
(http://www.bttr-software.de) is back again (including the forum) since 18-
august
Thank you Robert Riebisch for this resurrection!
Laaca
Hello Ruxgulo, hello Bart,
Thanks for your efforts, of course, but ... it's still got some bugs. The
Watcom build runs faster (oddly), but my TESTS.BAT just silently fails. And
the others (Turbo and GCC) seem to later on cause "Invalid Opcode". So I
haven't weakly tried isolating that yet. I
