Hello all,
I am still getting some very weird observations when look into why
FreeCOM weirds out:
When I recompiled FreeCOM on my end with GCC, and tried to run "fetch
mem" inside the METADOS setup, the command.com grew the heap area very
quickly when handling the complex batch files, and
Hi,
On Fri, Aug 24, 2018 at 6:48 AM David McMackins wrote:
>
> > in that case, you are showing acute symptoms of stallmanitis.
>
> You can use slurs all you want.
Some people here are apparently not as pro Free Software as the rest
of us. Though it's (almost) impossible to be a zealot with DOS,
> in that case, you are showing acute symptoms of stallmanitis.
You can use slurs all you want. I'm citing an accepted definition to
clear a misconception. By the way, I don't even like Richard Stallman,
and I won't be part of the FSF much longer. FreeDOS claims to be a free
system with all
>> You're kidding, right?
> Um, no I'm not kidding.
you are not kidding, because it's not even remotely funny.
in that case, you are showing acute symptoms of stallmanitis.
> Happy Hacking,
> David E. McMackins II
> Supporting Member, Electronic Frontier Foundation (#2296972)
> Associate
> You're kidding, right?
Um, no I'm not kidding. You should read any one of the free licenses on
this list:
https://www.gnu.org/licenses/license-list.html#SoftwareLicenses
For any given one of them, whoever is distributing it is allowed to
charge a fee, and then the recipient may distribute
On 8/23/2018 11:42 AM, David McMackins wrote:
And that means you still have to pay
$59 to get the source code for the compiler, which I think, regardless
of license, doesn't really qualify as ' more "free" than
OpenWatcom'...
Not really. If it's under a free (as in freedom) license, then only
On 8/23/2018 12:23 PM, Robert Riebisch wrote:
Hi Ralf,
Do you have a link stating that Walter Bright changed the license on his
C(++) compiler?
https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=17129678
Besten Dank, Robert!
Just curious as to why there is not one word mentioned on his Digital
Mars web
