[Freedos-devel] Filesystems Research?

2024-11-11 Thread Louis Santillan via Freedos-devel
I don't know who is doing any sort of DOS Filesystems Research beyond Mateusz Viste with EtherDFS/etherflop, and Michael Brutman with NetDrive. But I found an interesting repo that might extend DOS' usability a little bit further. There's a "lite weight ext4" library that supports ext2, ext3, and

Re: [Freedos-devel] multiple defintions of all functions in the program compiled and in the library

2024-11-11 Thread Paul Dufresne via Freedos-devel
Le lun., 11 nov. 2024 17:34:17 -0500 Rugxulo via Freedos-devel a écrit > Presumably this will solve your problem: > > -fgnu89-inline > > * https://gcc.gnu.org/onlinedocs/gcc/Inline.html > > N.B. GCC 14.2 is by default using "gnu17" dialect (aka, C17 w/ GNU > extensions), IIRC

[Freedos-devel] How would one go about getting a package added?

2024-11-11 Thread Kirn Gill via Freedos-devel
Sorry if the question seems obvious, I've many irons in many fires so I'm not always up-to-date on things. To the meat of the email: I'd like to get a program I'm working on into the FreeDOS package repository. It's a utility program that reads out headers of executable files, and is likely classi

Re: [Freedos-devel] multiple defintions of all functions in the program compiled and in the library

2024-11-11 Thread Rugxulo via Freedos-devel
Hi, On Mon, Nov 11, 2024 at 5:58 AM Paul Dufresne via Freedos-devel wrote: > > The place where functions of the library should be... is in the library... > not in the program that include the library. > > Only prototypes... should be in the program .h files. > If a function is inline... it's nam

[Freedos-devel] RBE

2024-11-11 Thread Jerome Shidel via Freedos-devel
Hello All, Sort-of big news… Work on The Release Build Environment, 4th Edition has begun. This is a very big undertaking. Why do we need a new version? Well, the 3rd Edition works well enough for creating the FreeDOS Interim and Release builds. But, it was thrown together quickly because it

Re: [Freedos-devel] multiple defintions of all functions in the program compiled and in the library

2024-11-11 Thread Louis Santillan via Freedos-devel
You might want to just borrow the bits here ( https://www.mrdictionary.net/allegro/). On Mon, Nov 11, 2024 at 3:58 AM Paul Dufresne via Freedos-devel < freedos-devel@lists.sourceforge.net> wrote: > Thinking about it... > > The place where functions of the library should be... is in the library...

[Freedos-devel] Ré : Tested a bit DJ_ALEGO:half working

2024-11-11 Thread Paul Dufresne via Freedos-devel
At first I did not made a link with examples not working correctly... But now I realized that while trying to build the Allegro library with a recent compiler... I had saved_ds not found errors... In src/misc/vbeafex.c I change to fix it: unsigned short saved_ds = 0; /* Paul remove static from p

Re: [Freedos-devel] multiple defintions of all functions in the program compiled and in the library

2024-11-11 Thread Paul Dufresne via Freedos-devel
Thinking about it... The place where functions of the library should be... is in the library... not in the program that include the library. Well I wrote previous sentence, then change the order, then change it again... it still not so obvious to me. But I guess it should be! Only prototypes...