Re: [Freedos-devel] List of Exitcodes

> On May 27, 2025, at 8:30 PM, Jerome Shidel via Freedos-devel > wrote: > > > >> On May 27, 2025, at 5:31 PM, Aitor Santamaría via Freedos-devel >> > > wrote: >> >> Hi, >> >> Thanks to all for the attention. >> Actually I seem to vaguely remembe

Re: [Freedos-devel] List of Exitcodes

> On May 27, 2025, at 5:31 PM, Aitor Santamaría via Freedos-devel > wrote: > > Hi, > > Thanks to all for the attention. > Actually I seem to vaguely remember some such list in an undocumented DOS > book or document, but was unable to find it, and hoped someone would. > > Thanks anyway! > Ai

Re: [Freedos-devel] List of Exitcodes

Hi, Thanks to all for the attention. Actually I seem to vaguely remember some such list in an undocumented DOS book or document, but was unable to find it, and hoped someone would. Thanks anyway! Aitor El mar, 27 may 2025 a las 20:05, Bret Johnson () escribió: > > Does anyone know of a page (o

Re: [Freedos-devel] Kernel package question

Hi Tom, new components should NEVER be tested in conjunction with multiple other changes. NEVER. A good idea in theory, but upgrading a distro, including FreeDOS, usually gives you updates to dozens, hundreds or thousands of packages and this is how in practice MANY users "live" updates. E

Re: [Freedos-devel]  Re: Kernel package question

On Tue, 27 May 2025, Jim Hall via Freedos-devel wrote: As a workaround, EDR-DOS added a copy of an email (I think from Bryan Sparks) that said it was okay to use code derived from CP/M. And from that, the EDR-DOS developers claimed that gave them a loophole to keep working on EDR-DOS without wor

Re: [Freedos-devel]  Re: Kernel package question

Hi Tom, > Am 27.05.2025 um 16:17 schrieb tom ehlert via Freedos-devel > : > > I don't have any secret information. > I'm just worried that there might be a reason PerditionC hasn't released > *any* kernels over the last few years, while there has been so much > added/fixed. > And I have asked

Re: [Freedos-devel]  Re: Kernel package question

Fritz, > Tom, > I am not sure if understand the trial system of FDT250x: > The kernel will be online for one month till the next version e.g. FDT2507. > So if someone reports a bigger problem with the kernel it will disappear > within one month. > I know bugs that are 20 and more years old.

Re: [Freedos-devel]  Re: Kernel package question

On Tue, May 27, 2025 at 11:19 AM Bitácora de Javier Gutiérrez Chamorro (Guti) via Freedos-devel wrote: > > On the user perspective I am more on the EDR-DOS side, and since > latests efforts on it, maybe a kernel change will make sense. > https://github.com/SvarDOS/edrdos > Not meaning any disresp

Re: [Freedos-devel]  Re: Kernel package question

Tom, I am not sure if understand the trial system of FDT250x: The kernel will be online for one month till the next version e.g. FDT2507. So if someone reports a bigger problem with the kernel it will disappear within one month. I know bugs that are 20 and more years old. As nobody worries abou

Re: [Freedos-devel] List of Exitcodes

> Does anyone know of a page (or has a file) with a complete listing of > exitcodes > for the various DOS commands? (at least MS-DOS) I was unable to find such a > page, the information seems scattered. I don't think there is such a list, and I don't even think MS produced such a list. ErrorL

[Freedos-devel] CSM BIOS for EFI machines

I saw this on hackernews. PC BIOS for EFI machines. Alleges to boot FreeDOS in QEMU and some physical machines. I wonder if this could be improved. https://github.com/FlyGoat/csmwrap ___ Freedos-devel mailing list Freedos-devel@lists.sourceforge.net http

Re: [Freedos-devel]  Re: Kernel package question

On the user perspective I am more on the EDR-DOS side, and since latests efforts on it, maybe a kernel change will make sense. https://github.com/SvarDOS/edrdos =-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-= Remitente:tom ehlert via Freedos-devel Destinatar

Re: [Freedos-devel]  Re: Kernel package question

Hallo Herr Bernd Böckmann via Freedos-devel, am Dienstag, 27. Mai 2025 um 11:52 schrieben Sie: >> Am 27.05.2025 um 09:02 schrieb tom ehlert via Freedos-devel >> : >> >> A new kernel.sys can be - and should be - tested independently of all the >> surrounding stuff, >> so you have potential iss

Re: [Freedos-devel]  Re: Kernel package question

> Am 27.05.2025 um 09:02 schrieb tom ehlert via Freedos-devel > : > > A new kernel.sys can be - and should be - tested independently of all the > surrounding stuff, > so you have potential issues automatically isolated to the kernel, and > nothing else. It is not that the new kernel is compl

Re: [Freedos-devel] Kernel package question

I shamelessly added that my copy of our new documentation repo [1] and did a merge request :) Otherwise this useful information will get lost in the mail archive... [1]: https://gitlab.com/FreeDOS/docs Bernd > The following is just a general reminder to everyone who may not be aware of > som

Re: [Freedos-devel]  Re: Kernel package question

Hallo Herr Jerome Shidel via Freedos-devel, am Dienstag, 27. Mai 2025 um 04:00 schrieben Sie: > On May 26, 2025, at 6:02 PM, Wilhelm Spiegl via Freedos-devel > wrote: > does this mean that the new test kernel is in fdt2506? > Should be. Unless something doesn’t work the way it is supp