That was me.

I openend an issue in the FreeDOS Archive tracker thas OMF output seems to be 
broken in 2.16:

https://gitlab.com/FreeDOS/devel/nasm/-/issues/1

I also mailed H.P. Anvin and informed him about what I consider to be a bug. I 
do not know if they have / will fix it, or if it is a misunderstanding by me.

Greetings, Bernd


> Am 01.05.2023 um 08:45 schrieb Rugxulo <rugx...@gmail.com>:
> 
> Hi,
> 
> On Sun, Apr 30, 2023 at 4:54 PM <rehsd.i...@gmail.com> wrote:
>> 
>> In, kernel/pcb.h, I see some notes about “offsets must match the assembly 
>> process”
>> and a couple of different layouts for the offsets. Could this be related to 
>> the issue I am having?
>> I am using NASM 2.16.01 and Watcom 1.9.
> 
> Someone reported that there was a regression in OMF/OBJ for NASM
> 2.16.01 regarding 16-bit segments.
> 
> Try reverting to NASM 2.15.05 instead:
> 
> * 
> http://www.ibiblio.org/pub/micro/pc-stuff/freedos/files/devel/asm/nasm/2.15.05/
> 
> Or, for really having fun, try the ancient 0.98.39 16-bit version:
> 
> * 
> http://www.ibiblio.org/pub/micro/pc-stuff/freedos/files/devel/asm/nasm/0.98.39/8086host/
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Freedos-devel mailing list
> Freedos-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/freedos-devel



_______________________________________________
Freedos-devel mailing list
Freedos-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/freedos-devel

Reply via email to