: Florian Xaver [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Saturday, September 16, 2006 01:37 PM
To: freedos-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
Subject: Re: [Freedos-devel] [anounce] defrag 1.2
Hi, I tested version 1.2.1 I geht the same error (FAT32, ~35GB). With
drivers and without ANY (even without XMS driver
Hi, I tested version 1.2.1 I geht the same error (FAT32, ~35GB). With
drivers and without ANY (even without XMS driver).
bye
Flo
-
Using Tomcat but need to do more? Need to support web services, security?
Get stuff done
: Florian Xaver [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Saturday, September 16, 2006 01:37 PM
To: freedos-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
Subject: Re: [Freedos-devel] [anounce] defrag 1.2
Hi, I tested version 1.2.1 I geht the same error (FAT32, ~35GB). With
drivers and without ANY (even without XMS driver
don't see where a 32 Bit DOS would make any difference
for this; good old realmode DOS will do.
Tom
-Original Message-
From: Florian Xaver [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Saturday, September 16, 2006 01:37 PM
To: freedos-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
Subject: Re: [Freedos-devel] [anounce
I wrote to the author this summer ... it looked that he wanted to
continue with RXDOS, but I think he is too busy. It is a nice kernel too -
I think one of the bugs is a LFN bug when deleting a file...
A link at the kernel page would be good...
bye
Flo
On Wed, 13 Sep 2006 23:10:33
PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, September 12, 2006 08:20 AM
To: freedos-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
Subject: Re: [Freedos-devel] [anounce] defrag 1.2
Hi,
as a substitute for Florian I did a quick test with 1.2.1.:
what's good, my simple test case, defragmenting a FreeDOS image mounted with
SHSURDRV (size 16
-Original Message-
From: Imre Leber [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, September 13, 2006 11:12 AM
To: freedos-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
Subject: Re: [Freedos-devel] [anounce] defrag 1.2
G,
If you change the release=line to
release = #-DNDEBUGuncomment when doing
-Original Message-
From: Japheth [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, September 12, 2006 09:06 AM
To: freedos-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
Subject: Re: [Freedos-devel] [anounce] defrag 1.2
Yes, you first have to lock the drive. With the lock command.
This is windows specific
Hi,
This is an official test for DOSEMU version 1.3.x:
// Test DOSEMU
if (!memcmp((char *)0xFFFE0,$DOSEMU$,8))
isDosEmu=true;
Some old version doesn't work but I am not sure of how old old is ;-)
Alain
Imre Leber escreveu:
But then it doesn't work in DOSemu and some other
-Original Message-
From: Alain M. [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, September 13, 2006 03:17 PM
To: freedos-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
Subject: Re: [Freedos-devel] [anounce] defrag 1.2
Hi,
It always amazes me how little sense I talk.
Defrag already can check for DOSemu
Imre Leber escreveu:
It always amazes me how little sense I talk.
Sorry if I missunderstood you...
But what I mean is that if you can test for dosemu, then you don't need
to use #define and decide real time if defrag may work on not.
I have also a very big test of OS version, it did take a
@lists.sourceforge.net
Subject: Re: [Freedos-devel] [anounce] defrag 1.2
Imre Leber escreveu:
It always amazes me how little sense I talk.
Sorry if I missunderstood you...
But what I mean is that if you can test for dosemu, then you don't need
to use #define and decide real time if defrag may work on not.
I
Imre Leber escreveu:
Well you did put some work in this.
:)
And was thorough. Does anybody actually use RXDOS?
Unfortunatly it was abandoned. It was 110% MSDOS compatible: it's author
is the writer of Undocumentd DOS
And it was almost ready. I remember that there were just 3 bugs, not
Hi,
as a substitute for Florian I did a quick test with 1.2.1.:
what's good, my simple test case, defragmenting a FreeDOS image mounted with
SHSURDRV (size 16 MB) gives no longer the undefined problem error.
what's bad, a true FAT32 drive (44 GB) still displays that error.
The error message
-Original Message-
From: Japheth [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, September 12, 2006 08:20 AM
To: freedos-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
Subject: Re: [Freedos-devel] [anounce] defrag 1.2
Hi,
as a substitute for Florian I did a quick test with 1.2.1.:
what's good, my simple test
Yes, you first have to lock the drive. With the lock command.
This is windows specific. Nothing defrag can do about that.
That's a bit weak. DEFRAG could
- refuse to run on MS-DOS 7 at all (or just for FAT32)
- display that the drive is not locked and exit
- lock/unlock the drive itself
-Original Message-
From: Japheth [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, September 12, 2006 09:06 AM
To: freedos-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
Subject: Re: [Freedos-devel] [anounce] defrag 1.2
Yes, you first have to lock the drive. With the lock command.
This is windows specific
-Original Message-
From: Japheth [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, September 12, 2006 08:20 AM
To: freedos-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
Subject: Re: [Freedos-devel] [anounce] defrag 1.2
Hi,
as a substitute for Florian I did a quick test with 1.2.1.:
what's good, my simple test
Imre Leber schrieb:
The error message undefined problem is not very good. The user is
uncertain
about the severity of the problem and if data has been lost. Some additional
infos about the drive's state after the error would be good.
There must be close to 1000 return FALSE's in there.
@lists.sourceforge.net
Subject: Re: [Freedos-devel] [anounce] defrag 1.2
Imre Leber wrote:
-Original Message-
From: Florian Xaver [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Saturday, September 9, 2006 09:45 PM
To: freedos-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
Subject: Re: [Freedos-devel] [anounce] defrag 1.2
Hi,
I tried
-Original Message-
From: Florian Xaver [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Saturday, September 9, 2006 09:45 PM
To: freedos-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
Subject: Re: [Freedos-devel] [anounce] defrag 1.2
Hi,
I tried Full Optimization and Unfragment Files only.
On my download area you can
Imre Leber wrote:
-Original Message-
From: Florian Xaver [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Saturday, September 9, 2006 09:45 PM
To: freedos-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
Subject: Re: [Freedos-devel] [anounce] defrag 1.2
Hi,
I tried Full Optimization and Unfragment Files only
-Original Message-
From: Jim Hall [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Sunday, September 10, 2006 06:42 PM
To: freedos-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
Subject: Re: [Freedos-devel] [anounce] defrag 1.2
Imre Leber wrote:
-Original Message-
From: Florian Xaver [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED
Imre:
Is DFRAG121.ZIP an official 1.2.1 release, something that I should
mirror on ibiblio? Or is this just an interim release, sort of try
this and see if this fixes your problem, and if it does I'll make it a
full release kind of thing?
Actually I was going to announce it
-Original Message-
From: Florian Xaver [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, September 8, 2006 04:36 PM
To: freedos-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
Subject: Re: [Freedos-devel] [anounce] defrag 1.2
Hi,
I tested DEFRAG 1.2 on my desktop pc.
I have 3 partitions with FAT32 (10GB). On every
-Original Message-
From: Florian Xaver [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, September 8, 2006 04:36 PM
To: freedos-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
Subject: Re: [Freedos-devel] [anounce] defrag 1.2
Hi,
I tested DEFRAG 1.2 on my desktop pc.
I have 3 partitions with FAT32 (10GB). On every
Hi,
I have fixed a problem on FAT32 that may be the one you are talking
about.But this only occurs with unfragment files only. Other then that
it seams to work, also on 15Gb.
Can you tell me which other method(s) you are talking about?
I tried all unfragment methodes, which doesn't sort
-Original Message-
From: Florian Xaver [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Saturday, September 9, 2006 06:43 PM
To: freedos-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
Subject: Re: [Freedos-devel] [anounce] defrag 1.2
Hi,
I have fixed a problem on FAT32 that may be the one you are talking
about.But
@lists.sourceforge.net
Subject: Re: [Freedos-devel] [anounce] defrag 1.2
Hi,
snip
I tried all unfragment methodes, which doesn't sort files and
directories.
Ok, this is confusing. Do you mean you used all defragmentation methods.
Or do you mean you used unfragment files only and directories first
Hi,
I tested DEFRAG 1.2 on my desktop pc.
I have 3 partitions with FAT32 (10GB). On every hard disc DEFRAG told me:
Undefined problem. What does this mean?
If I change the methode of optimization, I also get this error.
Another window pops up sometimes, it says, that there is not enough
Hi,
I am hereby releasing a new version of defrag, defrag version 1.2. This solves
the bug found by Fritz Mueller, regarding disk corruption in the root directory.
Version 1.1 should hereby no longer be used, as it corrupts disk data.
You can find it at:
Imre Leber wrote:
Hi,
I am hereby releasing a new version of defrag, defrag version 1.2. This
solves the bug found by Fritz Mueller, regarding disk corruption in the root
directory.
Version 1.1 should hereby no longer be used, as it corrupts disk data.
You can find it at:
32 matches
Mail list logo
