Hi,
Bernd Blaauw escribió:
Alain schreef:
I said not long ago that running windows on FreeDOS is not a real
test, let me explain why: Windows at some point included some very
complicated locking mechanism to *avoid* windows running other DOSes.
AARD is only on beta releases, as was
Hi,
Bernd Blaauw escribió:
Alain schreef:
I said not long ago that running windows on FreeDOS is not a real
test, let me explain why: Windows at some point included some very
complicated locking mechanism to *avoid* windows running other DOSes.
AARD is only on beta releases, as was
This is somewhat offtopic from the FreeDOS development discussion, but
I'll post it anyway. There's an article that showed up on Slashdot this
morning, referencing the old 'DOS ain't done till Lotus won't run'
mantra: http://www.proudlyserving.com/archives/2005/08/dos_aint_done_t.html
On Wed, 03 Aug 2005 08:02:51 -0500, you wrote:
Compatibility for the sake of supporting applications is good.
Compatibility for the sake of compatibility is not necessarily good.
Did you think EVOLVE is good?
Such as the DEL command in WinXP can delete directory also, it's
combine the DELTREE
Hi,
I said not long ago that running windows on FreeDOS is not a real test,
let me explain why: Windows at some point included some very complicated
locking mechanism to *avoid* windows running other DOSes.
I like very much Michael Devore's aproach: (paraphased) if you find an
important
Hello Alain,
I said not long ago that running windows on FreeDOS is not a real test,
it would be a test, and it would fail. FreeDOS kernel isn't compatible
enough to run Windows 3.x
end of story.
let me explain why: Windows at some point included some very complicated
locking mechanism to
tom ehlert escreveu:
let me explain why: Windows at some point included some very complicated
locking mechanism to *avoid* windows running other DOSes.
plain wrong.
?? what I meant to say is that Windows 3.x (some version) had some code
to detect if the dos was really from Microsoft. This
Hello Alain,
let me explain why: Windows at some point included some very complicated
locking mechanism to *avoid* windows running other DOSes.
plain wrong.
?? what I meant to say is that Windows 3.x (some version) had some code
to detect if the dos was really from Microsoft. This was suposed
Johnson Lam escreveu:
My friend still code CLIPPER and DBASE, he doubt ...
When I tested Clipper for a friend, with network (MS-Client) it did have
problems with only one instruction: APPEND BLANK I traced it to the
return flag getting on a doulbe lock in the kernel. but could not find
