And just what is wrong with development in C? It could be worse, they could
have used B...
-T
- Original Message -
From: Oleg O. Chukaev [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, April 11, 2007 12:42 PM
Subject: Re: [Freedos-devel] File manager
Robert Riebisch wrote
: Wednesday, April 11, 2007 12:42 PM
Subject: Re: [Freedos-devel] File manager
Now Doszip have the same size and functionality as Norton Commander
3.0. Main mistake (IMHO) is use of C language for this program. If
development of Doszip will be continued, it became yet another NC
clone, like DOS
Oleg O. Chukaev wrote:
I am searched for a small and fast open-source file manager, but
found nothing. Now I use Volkov Commander, but it is not open-source
program :-(
Doszip is still under development (and looking for contributors):
http://www.bttr-software.de/links/#fileman
Robert
Robert Riebisch wrote:
Doszip is still under development (and looking for contributors):
http://www.bttr-software.de/links/#fileman
Now Doszip have the same size and functionality as Norton Commander
3.0. Main mistake (IMHO) is use of C language for this program. If
development of Doszip will be
Ladislav Lacina wrote:
I would like to ask: which file manager is preffered for FreeDOS
distributions? I think it is very important thing - nobody will
use DOS without any NC clone. And it is stupid to not have such
thing on the distribution CD/diskette.
I am searched for a small and fast
There is one Real Mode NDN, it is amall and much faster...
No LFN, small footprint, works very well :)
if you don't find it anywhere, I have a stripped down version (I lost
the full distro)
Alain
Oleg O. Chukaev escreveu:
Ladislav Lacina wrote:
I would like to ask: which file manager is
Oleg O. Chukaev wrote:
I am searched for a small and fast open-source file manager, but
found nothing. Now I use Volkov Commander, but it is not open-source
program :-(
What about Directory Freedom
http://home.comcast.net/~ghaff/bitmason/bitmasons.html?
It is small, fast and now open source.
My favorite one is NDN from http://ndn.muxe.com/index.php (there are
some others this is the good one) it is not exactly like NC, but on the
whole is is better. It is fas enoug on new machines, and it has been a
really long time since I got a crash... the only problem really is that
it is big,
I would like to ask: which file manager is preffered for FreeDOS distributions?
I think it is very important thing - nobody will use DOS without any NC clone.
And it is stupid to not have such thing on the distribution CD/diskette.
Maybe Necromancer's DOS Navigator? It is GNU but it doesn't
Hi,
I have 2 favourite file managers:
NDN - file managers with most features
FW - file wizard, also very good and much faster than NDN.
I would prefer FW in FreeDOS (and it is also open source!). I uploaded
source and binary to
On Sat, 7 Apr 2007, Ladislav Lacina wrote:
I would like to ask: which file manager is preffered for FreeDOS
distributions? I think it is very important thing - nobody will use DOS
without any NC clone. And it is stupid to not have such thing on the
distribution CD/diskette. Maybe
11 matches
Mail list logo
