Re: [Freedos-devel] IDE-type code editor

2009-11-06 Thread dos386
What is everyone else using to develop/debug their DOS apps here? FASM IDE (compiler hard merged in, cca 100 KiB total bloat), INFOPAD (some bugs, doesn't like HDPMI32), FreeDOS EDIT (some bugs, 64 KiB limit), Kinesics (needs HX, not feature rich). -- ~~~ wow ~~~

Re: [Freedos-devel] IDE-type code editor

2009-11-06 Thread Tom Ehlert
Is there a particular code editor (ideally, with IDE-type features like: being able to bind the maker/compiler to a keystroke, capturing of compiler errors into a separate window, etc.) that people here are using to work on the packages they maintain? Given that there are some really nice

[Freedos-devel] IDE-type code editor

2009-11-05 Thread Joe Emenaker
Is there a particular code editor (ideally, with IDE-type features like: being able to bind the maker/compiler to a keystroke, capturing of compiler errors into a separate window, etc.) that people here are using to work on the packages they maintain? Given that there are some really nice

Re: [Freedos-devel] IDE-type code editor

2009-11-05 Thread Gregory Pietsch
FreeDOS Edlin! (Actually, I use the joe editor under Cygwin to do a lot of my programming, and then make sure it compiles under MSVC 6.0 and OpenWatcom with a DOS target before sending it out.) Gregory Pietsch Joe Emenaker wrote: Is there a particular code editor (ideally, with IDE-type

Re: [Freedos-devel] IDE-type code editor

2009-11-05 Thread lyricalnanoha
On Thu, 5 Nov 2009, Gregory Pietsch wrote: FreeDOS Edlin! (Actually, I use the joe editor under Cygwin to do a lot of my programming, and then make sure it compiles under MSVC 6.0 and OpenWatcom with a DOS target before sending it out.) xDDD; Gregory Pietsch Joe Emenaker wrote: Is

Re: [Freedos-devel] IDE-type code editor

2009-11-05 Thread Robert Riebisch
Joe Emenaker wrote: Is there a particular code editor (ideally, with IDE-type features like: being able to bind the maker/compiler to a keystroke, capturing of compiler errors into a separate window, etc.) that people here are using to work on the packages they maintain? Try