Re: [Freedos-devel] New packages for future releases

2020-12-28 Thread Johnpaul Humphrey
I second the OpenGEM sentiment. One of the things that makes DOS special to me, is the simplicity, both of the API, and the usage. Lack of multitasking is a plus for me, not a minus. (IIRC GEM supports some multitasking though.) GEM does seem to have that simple, RAW, feel, and that's a good thing

Re: [Freedos-devel] New packages for future releases

2020-12-28 Thread tom ehlert
> And that was my thinking behind it. Writing yet another nondescript > GUI would be sort of pointless. +1 > The main strength of FreeDOS is its > ability to keep legacy software alive. But by definition there's no > legacy software available for a GUI that's written in 2020. +1 > Getting > clos

Re: [Freedos-devel] New packages for future releases

2020-12-28 Thread Danilo Pecher
Hi Ralf makes a very interesting and important point here, especially as it reminds me of my idealistic and somewhat overconfident self from 1993. Like many people back in the day I thought I was a l33t hax0r after three years of dabbling with Turbo-Pascal, Turbo-C and even some assembler. So, nat

Re: [Freedos-devel] New packages for future releases

2020-12-27 Thread Ralf Quint
On 12/27/2020 11:10 AM, Jim Hall wrote: The challenge we've had is lots of developers have wanted to create a GUI for FreeDOS, but then they get halfway through building one before they realize it's a lot of work. And then the project gets dropped. That leaves us with things like SEAL and oZo

Re: [Freedos-devel] New packages for future releases

2020-12-27 Thread Jim Hall
On Thu, Dec 24, 2020 at 5:53 PM Danilo Pecher < danilo.pec...@data-experts.biz> wrote: > Hi Eric, > > The ReactOS/Wine combo was what got me thinking in the first place. > ReactOS was from the start meant to replicate WIndows NT though, which > isn't quite what I had in mind, as that isn't quite t

Re: [Freedos-devel] New packages for future releases

2020-12-25 Thread Danilo Pecher
Hi, Wouldn't you reinvent the wheel with that? 32 bit DOS applications rely on a DOS extender and run okay that way, and to run 32bit WIndows applications, well, that's literally one of the purposes of ReactOS. What got me thinking was when I could no longer run Borland Delphi on Windows, because

Re: [Freedos-devel] New packages for future releases

2020-12-24 Thread Mercury Thirteen via Freedos-devel
Just a bit of FYI despite the project being nowhere near ready to go as of yet: there is a small group of us working on moving DOS into the 32-bit realm in the form of the [Night Kernel](https://groups.google.com/g/night-dos-kernel). As part of that journey, we eventually want a compatibility la

Re: [Freedos-devel] New packages for future releases

2020-12-24 Thread Danilo Pecher
Hi Eric, The ReactOS/Wine combo was what got me thinking in the first place. ReactOS was from the start meant to replicate WIndows NT though, which isn't quite what I had in mind, as that isn't quite the 16 bit world in which FreeDOS exists. Wine would be a starting point, as that definitely has 1

Re: [Freedos-devel] New packages for future releases

2020-12-24 Thread Eric Auer
Hi Danilo and merry holidays to everybody :-) > So here's the question: Is there a process to pitch new packages Just pitch them here. And if they are cool pitch them for our ibiblio or other repositories of other people on the list :-) >From there, distro inclusion would be a possible next ste

[Freedos-devel] New packages for future releases

2020-12-24 Thread Danilo Pecher
Ho,ho, everybody, First of all, merry holidays to all and I hope you're all safe in these difficult times. As the new year looms, it's time to get them new years resolutions in. I'm foregoing the usual stuff, like losing weight, because that won't work, just like the other years. Instead, inspire