At 07:37 AM 3/15/2006 -0300, Andreas Berger wrote:
Michael, you say that there is a programmatic way to disable this
feature; can you tell me how. Ideally it would be disabled by default and
enabled either programmatically or during complile/link time. But if I
can disable it programmatically
Hi!
15-Мар-2006 02:49 [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Michael Devore) wrote to
freedos-devel@lists.sourceforge.net:
>>MD> You can read OW newsgroups via e-mail, as there are services to do so.
>> May you hint me these services (email) addresses?
MD> I indicated www.news2mail.com has that service.
__
I wouldn't have commented except you said that. First, you can turn
it off any number of ways, like SET CAUSEWAY=NOVM, or reassemble
without the option enabled, or there is programmatic support to do
it. Second, CauseWay doesn't use the hard disk until you run out of
physical memory, which
At 03:06 PM 3/14/2006 +0300, Arkady V.Belousov wrote:
MD> You can read OW newsgroups via e-mail, as there are services to do so.
May you hint me these services (email) addresses?
I indicated www.news2mail.com has that service. You want me to stick your
e-mail address in for one of the
Hi!
14-Мар-2006 15:12 [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Andreas Berger) wrote to
freedos-devel@lists.sourceforge.net:
AB> Before someone comments, I don't like causeway since it uses the hard
AB> disk as heap and I don't know how to turn this off.
Probably this helps:
http://osdn.dl.sourceforge.net/sourceforg
At 03:12 PM 3/14/2006 -0300, Andreas Berger wrote:
I would like to add one issue:
With open watcom I can no longer use the WDOSX stub. The villain is wlink.
If I use the Watcom 11 (or 10) wlink everything is OK.
Before someone comments, I don't like causeway since it uses the hard disk
as he
I would like to add one issue:
With open watcom I can no longer use the WDOSX stub. The villain is
wlink. If I use the Watcom 11 (or 10) wlink everything is OK.
Before someone comments, I don't like causeway since it uses the hard
disk as heap and I don't know how to turn this off. This is re
"Arkady V.Belousov" wrote:
> You sometime express yourself too vivid :) (and hard to understand by
> non-native English speakers). :( How uncorn relates to installer platforms
> completness?
Unicorns (as the DOS installer) are a legend or at least very rare. ;-)
Robert Riebisch
--
BTTR Sof
Салям!
14-Мар-2006 03:10 [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Michael Devore) wrote to
freedos-devel@lists.sourceforge.net:
>> "DOS installer"? There is no such bestie in OpenWatcom. There is only
MD> There have been discussions of such a beastie, recent ones in fact. So the
MD> DOS installer is real insofar
At 11:10 AM 3/14/2006 +0300, Arkady V.Belousov wrote:
14-íÁÒ-2006 00:01 [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Michael Devore) wrote to
freedos-devel@lists.sourceforge.net:
MD> Most of the DOS installer concerns
"DOS installer"? There is no such bestie in OpenWatcom. There is only
one giant open-watcom-c-win3
Hi!
14-Мар-2006 09:41 [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Robert Riebisch) wrote to
freedos-devel@lists.sourceforge.net:
>> one giant open-watcom-c-win32-1.4.exe installer with unknown format (no
>> possibility to manually unpack required files) and requirement of WINNT
>> (Win32) to run.
RR> Just do a "pkunzip -
"Arkady V.Belousov" wrote:
> "DOS installer"? There is no such bestie in OpenWatcom. There is only
> one giant open-watcom-c-win32-1.4.exe installer with unknown format (no
> possibility to manually unpack required files) and requirement of WINNT
> (Win32) to run.
Just do a "pkunzip -d open-
Hi!
14-Мар-2006 00:01 [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Michael Devore) wrote to
freedos-devel@lists.sourceforge.net:
>> Ok. But note: many issues are minor (installer shows "2,047MB" when
>>more space available) and/or not very interested for other peoples (spaces
>>in help files). Also, in next separate
Hi!
14-Мар-2006 00:25 [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Michael Devore) wrote to
freedos-devel@lists.sourceforge.net:
MD> As far as differences between WCC and WPP, Michal previously made pretty
MD> clear that the two compilers are separate entities, and them operating
MD> differently is not a major concern for
At 01:44 AM 3/14/2006 +0300, Arkady V.Belousov wrote:
Hi!
[Note, list below is far from completion: this is first review of OW14 and
many issues of OW12 are awaiting to retest (for example, bugs in WMAKE and
MS2WLINK).]
OpenWatcom 1.4 wishes, issues, troubles and bugs
--
At 01:39 AM 3/14/2006 +0300, Arkady V.Belousov wrote:
13-íÁÒ-2006 14:37 [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Michael Devore) wrote to
freedos-devel@lists.sourceforge.net:
>>improved. May someone with online access inject my reports into OW bug
>>tracking system (in hope, that this gives better reaction for report
Hi!
[WCC/WPP 1.4]
- WPP: empty _DATA section described as byte-aligned, else as word-aligned.
- alignment differences; explicit zero initialization of static variables:
; int a, b = 0, c = 1;
WCC (word aligned, no optimization for explicit zero initialization):
CONST SEGMEN
Hi!
13-Мар-2006 14:37 [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Michael Devore) wrote to
freedos-devel@lists.sourceforge.net:
>>improved. May someone with online access inject my reports into OW bug
>>tracking system (in hope, that this gives better reaction for reports, than
MD> To the best of my knowledge, Michal, no
Hi!
[Note, list below is far from completion: this is first review of OW14 and
many issues of OW12 are awaiting to retest (for example, bugs in WMAKE and
MS2WLINK).]
OpenWatcom 1.4 wishes, issues, troubles and bugs
-! bug or critical flow
-+ wish
At 06:19 PM 3/13/2006 +0300, you wrote:
Two years ago I was try to report some issues with OW12 to Michael
Necasek. Right now I review OW14 and found that almost nothing fixed nor
improved. May someone with online access inject my reports into OW bug
tracking system (in hope, that this giv
Hi!
Two years ago I was try to report some issues with OW12 to Michael
Necasek. Right now I review OW14 and found that almost nothing fixed nor
improved. May someone with online access inject my reports into OW bug
tracking system (in hope, that this gives better reaction for reports, than
pr
21 matches
Mail list logo
