Hello Arkady,
> I suggest, this may cause troubles for your swapping FreeCOM edition.
> What I mean: FreeCOM loaded at FABh; when it runs program, it remains here
> (shorter) stub and swaps itself somewhere. Let suggest, some program will
> allocate memory at 1063h (right after stub). As I un
Hi!
30-Июн-2004 13:41 [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Steffen Kaiser) wrote
to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
0FA7 64--free--
0FAB 2.87k COMMAND
1063 574k --free--
9FEF 272COMMAND environment
>> PS: I understand, that _c
On Wed, 30 Jun 2004, Arkady V.Belousov wrote:
F> It is currently not possible to use FIRST_FIT (and therefore BEST_FIT
F> neither) and I do not hassle with the XMS code to move the environment
F> segment around.
Look at memory map above again. And look at FreeCOM map:
-0FA7 2.01k
Hi!
30-Июн-2004 08:53 [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Steffen Kaiser) wrote
to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
>> Do you mean: "if FreeCOM finds that its _parent_ PSP contains
>> ps_parent==0 (ie, it have no grandfather), then it should make yourself
>> permanent (set own ps_parent yo itself)?"?
On Wed, 30 Jun 2004, Arkady V.Belousov wrote:
Hello Arkady,
30-éÀÎ-2004 00:54 [EMAIL PROTECTED] (FreeCOM) wrote to
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:
OK, I actually seem to have misinterpreted your description that INSTALL=
and SHELL= programs will get passed an EnvSeg == 0, as this is wrong,
please ignore anyth
Hi!
30-Июн-2004 00:54 [EMAIL PROTECTED] (FreeCOM) wrote to
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:
>> SK> So, when the environment segment of the primary shell is zero, how are the
>> SK> environment variables passed to it?
>> 1. parent_PSP is a DOS PSP, which parent for command.com PSP (and other
>>INSTALL progr
Arkady V.Belousov wrote:
Hello,
SK> Please don't gallop so fast, how about to make some thinking first.
SK> So, when the environment segment of the primary shell is zero, how are the
SK> environment variables passed to it?
1. parent_PSP is a DOS PSP, which parent for command.com PSP (and other
I
Hi!
28-Июн-2004 08:49 [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Steffen Kaiser) wrote
to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
"[EMAIL PROTECTED]" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
SK> actually many of your posts makes me to wonder puzzled what you really
SK> _mean_. This thread is one of them.
>> Yes, but who know, may be c
Hallo Arkady,
actually many of your posts makes me to wonder puzzled what you really
_mean_. This thread is one of them.
On Sun, 27 Jun 2004, Arkady V.Belousov wrote:
26-éÀÎ-2004 20:35 [EMAIL PROTECTED] (FreeCOM) wrote to
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Yes, but who know, may be command.com not starts, bu
