Hi,
On Mon, Sep 3, 2012 at 2:14 PM, Zoltán Bacskó wrote:
>
>> Re: Turbo51, I've seen it but am quite skeptical.
>
> Would you tell me the reasons of your skepticism explicitly? I trust
> your judgement, so if there are serious issues with TPC16 I will
> remove the references from my site and prog
Hi !
> Doh! I wasn't sure, just assumed it was often surname first in
> Hungary. Anyways, I renamed it (as requested):
You know it right, but in english written e-mails I usually switch my
names according to english grammar rules. So it was a double switch :)
>Updated the .ZIP.
Thanks!
> Re: T
Hi,
On Sun, Sep 2, 2012 at 2:41 PM, Zoltán Bacskó wrote:
>
> Thanks for the mirroring! (anyway I would like to inform you that
> Zoltán is my forename and there are many Zoltáns in Hungary, so if
> more hungarian contributors will join, this could be a problem
> :).Bacsko, or falcosoft would be m
Hi!
Thanks for the mirroring! (anyway I would like to inform you that
Zoltán is my forename and there are many Zoltáns in Hungary, so if
more hungarian contributors will join, this could be a problem
:).Bacsko, or falcosoft would be more ideal)
Turning to the subject, I updated PWR to 1.2, now the
Hi,
On Fri, Aug 31, 2012 at 5:06 PM, Zoltán Bacskó wrote:
>
> According to your feedback the programs that most likely would be
> useful for FreeDOS are FAKEMEM, FVID, TSCDOS, PWR and LOWP.
> Thanks to your suggestions and informations four of them are now
> available with source code and JWASM c
Hi!
According to your feedback the programs that most likely would be
useful for FreeDOS are FAKEMEM, FVID, TSCDOS, PWR and LOWP.
Thanks to your suggestions and informations four of them are now
available with source code and JWASM compatibility.
For LOWP (athlon64 architecture low power util) to
Hi,
On Mon, Aug 27, 2012 at 9:08 PM, Zoltán Bacskó wrote:
>
>> P.S. TSCDOS sounds cool, has TASM sources, but I'm not sure how
>> accurate it is. Some processors (e.g. early Pentiums) eventually
>> reset, and later ones were wonky (non-atomic??) on SMP machines. I
>> guess that doesn't matter for
Hi!
> P.S. TSCDOS sounds cool, has TASM sources, but I'm not sure how
> accurate it is. Some processors (e.g. early Pentiums) eventually
> reset, and later ones were wonky (non-atomic??) on SMP machines. I
> guess that doesn't matter for us (and still seems to work correctly
> here). You should p
Hi !
> The Turion / Athlon64 mobile / Sempron / ... and Phenom tools
> to select lower voltages and clock frequencies sound exciting,
> could you extend them to also support AMD desktop processors?
> Does support depend on the mainboard chipset as well?
As far as I know none of them depends on c
Hi,
On Mon, Aug 27, 2012 at 3:43 AM, Zoltán Bacskó wrote:
>
> I have some DOS programs that can be useful for the FreeDOS community.
>
> http://falco1.heliohost.org/softwares.html#dos
>
> Regarding source codes I'm not familiar with Freedos coding standards,
> so If you need them contact me. (But
Hi :-)
> http://falco1.heliohost.org/softwares.html#dos
>
> Most of them mainly help the old DOS environment to cooperate better
> with modern processors (PWR or LOWP) or just help testing in some way
> (TSCDOS, CACHE).
The Turion / Athlon64 mobile / Sempron / ... and Phenom tools
to select low
Hi !
I have some DOS programs that can be useful for the FreeDOS community.
I don't know which way of contribution is adequate yet, so I have
chosen this mailing list.
The softwares can be found here:
http://falco1.heliohost.org/softwares.html#dos
Most of them mainly help the old DOS environment
12 matches
Mail list logo
