[Freedos-devel] defrag project update

2007-08-19 Thread Imre Leber
Well this probably isn't very interesting but I also updated the savannah project for defrag. For those that still remember it, it is at: http://www.nongnu.org/free-defrag/ and http://savannah.nongnu.org/projects/free-defrag Imre

Re: [Freedos-devel] defrag 1.2

2006-09-16 Thread Blair Campbell
dosfsck is 32-bit. Defrag could be too (especially a version which supports FAT32). On 9/16/06, Imre Leber [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: What doesn't stop to amaze me is that this project is so completely oposed to anything 32bit. But when it comes down to it you all complain that things don't

[Freedos-devel] defrag problems

2006-08-31 Thread Imre Leber
Hi, It seems that the latest version of defrag is not fully stable. 90% of the defragmentation code has been rewritten and it seems that even after 2 months of testing it doesn't work correctly. I will look into it. Make a new release and then make it more like the windows nt defragmentation

[Freedos-devel] defrag on FAT32

2006-08-13 Thread Imre Leber
I guess it would probably be wise to only allow unfragment files only method on FAT32. Even if you could get 1 Gb an hour for a defragmentation. It would still take 160 hours to defragment a 160Gb drive. I don't think anyone could wait 10 days to defragment his computer. Imre

[Freedos-devel] defrag

2006-08-08 Thread Imre Leber
I have made all my changes to support FAT32 in defrag. Just needs to be tested. But I see that my previous version (1.0) was not picked up. Is there any specific reason? I could understand if it is not going to be in FreeDOS 1, altough it is highly recommended. Imre

Re: [Freedos-devel] defrag

2006-08-08 Thread Blair Campbell
It will be in, I just didn't get to adding it at that time (I wanted to make sure that things didn't fail horrilbly like they did for the previous version). On 8/8/06, Imre Leber [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I have made all my changes to support FAT32 in defrag. Just needs to be tested. But I see

Re: [Freedos-devel] defrag

2006-08-08 Thread Imre Leber
I meant it wasn't on ibiblio :-) Imre -Original Message- From: Blair Campbell [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, August 8, 2006 09:18 AM To: freedos-devel@lists.sourceforge.net Subject: Re: [Freedos-devel] defrag It will be in, I just didn't get to adding it at that time (I

Re: [Freedos-devel] defrag

2006-08-08 Thread Florian Xaver
I want to test it - could you please post a URL, where I can download it? Thanks Flo On Tue, 08 Aug 2006 09:15:59 +0200, Imre Leber [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I have made all my changes to support FAT32 in defrag. Just needs to be tested. But I see that my previous version (1.0) was

Re: [Freedos-devel] defrag

2006-08-08 Thread Imre Leber
-Original Message- From: Florian Xaver [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, August 8, 2006 12:36 PM To: freedos-devel@lists.sourceforge.net Subject: Re: [Freedos-devel] defrag I want to test it - could you please post a URL, where I can download it? You can find it at http

Re: [Freedos-devel] defrag

2006-08-08 Thread Andre Tertling
Imre Leber schrieb: You can find it at http://users.telenet.be/imre/FreeDOS/DEFRAG10.ZIP Doh, I should have had a look at it before posting. The source is included, so please disregard and completely ignore my last message :) Best regards, Andre

Re: [Freedos-devel] defrag

2006-08-08 Thread Jim Hall
Imre Leber wrote: -Original Message- From: Florian Xaver [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, August 8, 2006 12:36 PM To: freedos-devel@lists.sourceforge.net Subject: Re: [Freedos-devel] defrag I want to test it - could you please post a URL, where I can download

[Freedos-devel] defrag changes

2006-08-01 Thread Imre Leber
By now, you are all just wandering what happened to defrag version 1. Well, I am working on defrag. There will be two versions out shortly. One will be the version 1, stable. Same speed, no FAT support. A rather flat in your face screen problem with large disks will be fixed in this release

Re: [Freedos-devel] Defrag and fat32

2006-07-01 Thread Florian Xaver
There is an alternative that is both easy and already working: dosfsck. I have been using it and it apears to be working. (is is in djgpp) The pnly prople is that there was some fixes to the working release that I don't remember who did and where they are. All that is needed is to all that

[Freedos-devel] Defrag and fat32

2006-06-30 Thread Alain M.
There is an alternative that is both easy and already working: dosfsck. I have been using it and it apears to be working. (is is in djgpp) The pnly prople is that there was some fixes to the working release that I don't remember who did and where they are. All that is needed is to all that

Re: [Freedos-devel] Defrag and fat32

2006-06-30 Thread Blair Campbell
dosfsck doesn't do defragging, sorry. dosfsck is an alternative to _chkdsk_ :-). On 6/30/06, Alain M. [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: There is an alternative that is both easy and already working: dosfsck. I have been using it and it apears to be working. (is is in djgpp) The pnly prople is that

Re: [Freedos-devel] Defrag and fat32

2006-06-30 Thread Blair Campbell
And check eric's auersoft page somewhere for the dosfsck updates :-). -- Fall is my favorite season in Los Angeles, watching the birds change color and fall from the trees. David Letterman (1947 - ) See ya Using Tomcat but need to do more? Need to support web services, security? Get stuff

Re: [Freedos-devel] defrag, dosfsck and others

2006-06-30 Thread Alain M.
Eric Auer escreveu: Hi Alain, Blair, of course I had already mailed Alain off-list to tell him about his misunderstanding. And I HAD been thinking about whether I should CC you to tell you that I have already told him. Oh well. 2 more one-liner mails on the list which were only interesting

Re: [Freedos-devel] DEFRAG and DOSFSCK 2.8

2004-06-06 Thread Johnson Lam
Hi, DEFRAG refuse to work on my hard disk, but under TUI it didn't show the reason, just pop up a red alert and quit. I've to find the real problem using command line, is the error reporting part still not implemented? And when I want to fix the problem with DOSFSCK 2.8 (I tried the latest