Re: [Freedos-devel] emm 2.10

2006-07-11 Thread Michael Devore
At 08:05 PM 7/9/2006 +0400, Arkady V.Belousov wrote: Hi! 1. emm386.lsm file isn't updated (old version). It was updated in the distributed zip file. That's all I can do for it. 2. source code bug: emm386c.c, line 679 introduced nested /*, which in Nope. Closer examination will reveal no

Re: [Freedos-devel] emm 2.10

2006-07-11 Thread Arkady V.Belousov
Hi! 11-Июл-2006 18:57 [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Michael Devore) wrote to freedos-devel@lists.sourceforge.net: 1. emm386.lsm file isn't updated (old version). MD It was updated in the distributed zip file. That's all I can do for it. I report .lsm file from zip file! 2. source code bug:

[Freedos-devel] emm 2.10

2006-07-09 Thread Arkady V.Belousov
Hi! 1. emm386.lsm file isn't updated (old version). 2. source code bug: emm386c.c, line 679 introduced nested /*, which in different compilers and/or with different options handled differently (for example, by default BC supports nested comments). In any case, standard prohibits nested comments.

Re: [Freedos-devel] emm 2.10

2006-07-09 Thread Jim Hall
Arkady V.Belousov wrote: Hi! 1. emm386.lsm file isn't updated (old version). Fixed on www.freedos.org -jh -- I'm sorry my president's an idiot. I didn't vote for him. - Using Tomcat but need to do more? Need to

Re: [Freedos-devel] emm 2.10

2006-07-09 Thread Arkady V.Belousov
Hi! Jim, do you receive at last my private letters? I again receive messages, that may letters delayed: The original message was received at Sat, 8 Jul 2006 22:52:27 +0400 (MSD) from localhost [127.0.0.1] - The following addresses had transient non-fatal errors - jhall at

Re: [Freedos-devel] emm 2.10

2006-07-09 Thread Jim Hall
No, sorry I have not received your off-list emails. -jh Arkady V.Belousov wrote: Hi! Jim, do you receive at last my private letters? I again receive messages, that may letters delayed: The original message was received at Sat, 8 Jul 2006 22:52:27 +0400 (MSD) from localhost