Re: [Freedos-devel] freecom/cmd echo.c,1.5,1.6

2006-06-14 Thread Jim Hall
Specifically, the // was introduced in the C99 spec: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/C_programming_language#C99 Blair Campbell wrote: Well, the latest C standard says that // is a valid C source code comment, so... On 6/13/06, Aitor SantamarĂ­a [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: A slight commenr,

Re: [Freedos-devel] freecom/cmd echo.c,1.5,1.6

2006-06-14 Thread Alain M.
My 2c about that: FreeCOM compiles only with Borland, if it works, fine. Maybe some day it will be ported to OW, it is good to keep that in sight, which in this case is ok :) Alain Blair Campbell escreveu: Well, the latest C standard says that // is a valid C source code comment, so... On

Re: [Freedos-devel] freecom/cmd echo.c,1.5,1.6

2006-06-14 Thread Johnson Lam
On Wed, 14 Jun 2006 16:53:13 -0300, you wrote: Hi, My 2c about that: FreeCOM compiles only with Borland, if it works, fine. Maybe some day it will be ported to OW, it is good to keep that in sight, which in this case is ok :) I think it's pretty important that FreeCOM should be develop on a

Re: [Freedos-devel] freecom/cmd echo.c,1.5,1.6

2006-06-13 Thread Blair Campbell
Well, the latest C standard says that // is a valid C source code comment, so... On 6/13/06, Aitor SantamarĂ­a [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: A slight commenr, weren't you changing C++-style comments wich C-style comments? Sorry for being too concerned for such regardless comments! :-) Aitor