Hi,
I posted the message the 24th, and we all received it today.
Unfortunately, I am already used to the "quality" of service of my ISP,
Wanadoo/France Telecom... :-(((
Sorry, there isn't much that I can do...
Aitor
Bill Marcum escribió:
On Tue, Feb 24, 2004 at 09:18:28PM +0100, Aitor Santamar
Hi!
24-Фев-2004 21:18 [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Aitor Santamari'a Merino) wrote to
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:
>> Data usually not separated as "binary" or "not binary" (ie. textual),
ASM> Most people doesn't know that this difference even exists, and get
ASM> puzzled when they open binary data files with TY
On Tue, Feb 24, 2004 at 09:18:28PM +0100, Aitor Santamari'a Merino wrote:
> Most people doesn't know that this difference even exists, and get
> puzzled when they open binary data files with TYPE.
This message dated Feb. 24 just arrived today. Maybe it's some problem
with the list or your ISP (
Hi,
Arkady V.Belousov escribio':
ASM> (as a side note, this is unix-ish notation that I never liked much,
ASM> because in my understanding this folder is to be used in Unix/Linux for
ASM> executables in machine-binary language, whereas there might be BINary
ASM> DATA files, that are binary but no
On Tue, 24 Feb 2004 21:00:50 +0300 (MSK), you wrote:
Hi,
> Yes, though, "DOC" is not liked for me, because reminds MS Word. This
>directory, probably, may be called MAN (from "manual").
For better and much clearer definition, "TXT" should be best.
For example, you see PG.TXT or UDMA.TXT you
Hi!
24-Фев-2004 21:05 [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Eric Auer) wrote to
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:
>> BTW, keyboard.sys may be placed into NLS.
EA> No, is only 1 file. Keep it on traditional place: Same directory where
EA> keyboard binary is.
I say "may", not "should". :)
>> Data usually not separa
Hi!
> BTW, keyboard.sys may be placed into NLS.
No, is only 1 file. Keep it on traditional place: Same directory where
keyboard binary is.
> Data usually not separated as "binary" or "not binary" (ie. textual),
> whereas BIN is not worsest name. :) How else? EXE?
Calling it "bat-com-
Hi!
24-Фев-2004 20:12 [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Aitor Santamari'a Merino) wrote to
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:
ASM> (I've always considered it a very bad idea that Microsoft
ASM> chose DOC for the Microsoft Word native files, precisely because there
ASM> are many plain text files with extension DOC already too).
Arkady V.Belousov escribio':
Hi!
24-Фев-2004 01:06 [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Eric Auer) wrote to
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:
DOS- all exe/com/sys files
DOS\APPINFO- lsm files
DOS\DOC\project- documentation for 'project'
DOS\HELP - all help files
DOS\NLS- n
Hi!
24-Фев-2004 01:06 [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Eric Auer) wrote to
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:
>> DOS- all exe/com/sys files
>> DOS\APPINFO- lsm files
>> DOS\DOC\project- documentation for 'project'
>> DOS\HELP - all help files
>> DOS\NLS- national lang
>Hi!
>
>> DOS- all exe/com/sys files
>> DOS\APPINFO- lsm files
>> DOS\DOC\project- documentation for 'project'
>> DOS\HELP - all help files
>> DOS\NLS- national language support files
>> DOS\SOURCE\project - source code for 'project'
>
>S
Hi!
> DOS- all exe/com/sys files
> DOS\APPINFO- lsm files
> DOS\DOC\project- documentation for 'project'
> DOS\HELP - all help files
> DOS\NLS- national language support files
> DOS\SOURCE\project - source code for 'project'
Sounds oka
Then its your problem if ur installing it with msdos.
- Original Message -
From: "Eric Auer" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Friday, February 20, 2004 5:10 PM
Subject: [Freedos-devel] re: Don't you think its better to use Msdos file
names
&
Hi, I disagree. At least if there already IS a c:\dos directory,
FreeDOS should stay separate in its own c:\fdos or c:\freedos
directory. Otherwise, c:\dos is possible, but it would have to
contain the "bin" subdirectory of FreeDOS only. You would still
need a separate FreeDOS directory for the re
14 matches
Mail list logo
