On 5/10/2024 6:45 AM, Green Fog via Freedos-devel wrote:
There you go. The 2 requirements for free dos being a thing are just
not there. not ease of use. I need to use an antique mail list for
communication and wiki/documentation. It's absurd and very not
efficient. I am very busy, and I can't
On 5/10/2024 7:02 AM, Jim Hall via Freedos-devel wrote:
I'm usually a very nice guy, but I have to call this out:
If there was ever a prime example of how *not* to ask for help, this
email thread was it.
+1
Ralf
___
Freedos-devel mailing list
Freed
On Fri, May 10, 2024 at 11:01 AM Steve Nickolas via Freedos-devel
wrote:
>[..]
> I'm 44 and surmise that I am one of the *younger* regulars on the list, so
> is it really any surprise things are a bit old-fashioned around here?
> (Some of the other old-times probably know what an ignorant little n
On 5/10/24 09:45, Green Fog via Freedos-devel wrote:
There you go. The 2 requirements for free dos being a thing are just
not there. not ease of use. I need to use an antique mail list for
communication and wiki/documentation. It's absurd and very not
efficient. I am very busy, and I can't aff
On Fri, 10 May 2024, Green Fog via Freedos-devel wrote:
There you go. The 2 requirements for free dos being a thing are just not
there. not ease of use. I need to use an antique mail list for
communication and wiki/documentation. It's absurd and very not efficient. I
am very busy, and I can't af
Hi!
I’m rather reader of that list not developer.
It takes me 5 minutes to browse this mail thread and based on what I’ve
read it takes me another 3 minutes to find where is the source code of
command.com alternative named freecom. See here:
https://gitlab.com/FreeDOS/base/freecom
Please remember
On Fri, May 10, 2024 at 8:46 AM Green Fog via Freedos-devel
wrote:
>
> There you go. The 2 requirements for free dos being a thing are
> just not there. not ease of use. I need to use an antique mail
> list for communication and wiki/documentation. It's absurd
> and very not efficient. I am very b
There you go. The 2 requirements for free dos being a thing are just not
there. not ease of use. I need to use an antique mail list for
communication and wiki/documentation. It's absurd and very not efficient. I
am very busy, and I can't afford the time to download each of these
packages one by one
*First: it is not good "netiquette" to start a new thread when you are
following up from a previous post. You should have written this as a
reply to your first email.
On Wed, May 8, 2024 at 4:50 AM Green Fog via Freedos-devel
wrote:
>
> I can see the potential of Freedos if these 2 conditions are
> On May 8, 2024, at 5:50 AM, Green Fog via Freedos-devel
> wrote:
>
> I can see the potential of Freedos if these 2 conditions are met:
>
> 1, ease of use. Absolutely both for users and developers. Or else who is
> going to use it? or develop more fun and useful applications to it. So that
> On May 8, 2024, at 5:50 AM, Green Fog via Freedos-devel
> wrote:
>
> I can see the potential of Freedos if these 2 conditions are met:
>
> 1, ease of use. Absolutely both for users and developers. Or else who is
> going to use it? or develop more fun and useful applications to it. So tha
I can see the potential of Freedos if these 2 conditions are met:
1, ease of use. Absolutely both for users and developers. Or else who is
going to use it? or develop more fun and useful applications to it. So that
means better documentation, easier access to not only the source code but
also the
12 matches
Mail list logo
