Re: [Freedos-devel] Bug 0x5801/41

2023-04-21 Thread jerome
Has there been any follow up on this issue? ___ Freedos-devel mailing list Freedos-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/freedos-devel

Re: [Freedos-devel] Bug 0x5801/41

2023-04-09 Thread jerome
Hi All, I fixed some erroneous source code comments in the testing program. Since none of the binaries support command line options, I moved it’s configuration settings into a SETTINGS.INC file. This provides an easier way to change what size blocks, UMB link state, allocation strategy and t

Re: [Freedos-devel] Bug 0x5801/41

2023-04-07 Thread jerome
> On Apr 7, 2023, at 12:23 PM, tom ehlert wrote: > > Hi, > >> Don’t know if the issue is in the Kernel (0.85a), HimemX (3.38), JEMM386 >> (5.83) or My Head. > > it's in the Kernel - or in your head. Yep, could be my interpretation of the documentation. > > to decide between these two alt

Re: [Freedos-devel] Bug 0x5801/41

2023-04-07 Thread Rugxulo
Hi, On Fri, Apr 7, 2023 at 11:46 AM tom ehlert wrote: > > and - well I understand that kernel version control is a complete > mess - but Kernel 0.85a seems a bit unlikely given that > https://github.com/FDOS/kernel/blob/master/docs/history.txt refers to > 0.42. * https://github.com/FDOS/kernel

Re: [Freedos-devel] Bug 0x5801/41

2023-04-07 Thread tom ehlert
Hi, > Don’t know if the issue is in the Kernel (0.85a), HimemX (3.38), JEMM386 > (5.83) or My Head. it's in the Kernel - or in your head. to decide between these two alternatives it's always helpful to send your actual sources - not an english description of what you had intended to do. and of