On Mon, 23 Feb 2004, Jim Hall wrote:
I would prefer a C:\DOS directory with all exacutables inside. Users
will feel more confortable with it ;-)
My thought would be to put them inside C:\DOS as subdirs.
Note that the install dir from the install program would need to use
C:\DOS as the
Hi!
24--2004 20:04 [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Aitor Santamari'a Merino) wrote to
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:
mf C:\DOS - same as above + any support files
I think, if there will be too many support files of some type (say,
fonts), then they should be moved into own subdirectory (say,
Hi,
Arkady V.Belousov escribio':
Hi!
24--2004 20:04 [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Aitor Santamari'a Merino) wrote to
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:
mf C:\DOS - same as above + any support files
I think, if there will be too many support files of some type (say,
fonts), then they should be moved into
Arkady V.Belousov escribio':
Hi!
24--2004 21:07 [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Aitor Santamari'a Merino) wrote to
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:
ASM In MS-DOS for most of the countries (I'd say) you rarely use much more
ASM than EGA.CPI (or EGA2.CPI).
So what? If many files are not used, you may remove them (to
Alain wrote:
Steve Nickolas escreveu:
At Fri, 20 Feb 2004 3:19pm -0500, togermano.com wrote:
Don't you think its better to use Msdos file names? So like a program
can edit it. And its easyer for people that know msdos file names
instead of like fddos for a directory etc..
Opinions vary but I
Hi,
--- Jim Hall [EMAIL PROTECTED] Alain
wrote:
My thought would be to put them inside C:\DOS as
subdirs.
For example:
DOS- all exe/com/sys files
DOS\APPINFO- lsm files
DOS\DOC\project- documentation for 'project'
DOS\HELP - all help
At Fri, 20 Feb 2004 3:19pm -0500, togermano.com wrote:
Don't you think its better to use Msdos file names? So like a program
can edit it. And its easyer for people that know msdos file names
instead of like fddos for a directory etc..
Opinions vary but I do agree.
-uso.
