yOn Mon, 5 Sep 2011, Jim Michaels wrote:
I can tell you that the packet drivers I was directed to, crynwyr, are SO
OLD. no development has been done on DOS packet drivers since then,
apparently. solution? get the drivers from realtek (the email I sent to
this list earlier), and get a cheap et
. voila.
DOS packet drivers are available from NIC manufacturers.
>
>From: dos386
>To: freedos-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
>Sent: Wednesday, August 17, 2011 1:11 AM
>Subject: Re: [Freedos-devel] potential issues with freedos in virtual
>env
> Why should we have to tell DOS users that only a certain and
> small subset of all virtual environments can do FreeDOS?
Alternatively, tell them to install it on a PC ;-)
> Using as many different emulators/virtualisers as possible among
> developers/testers might show issues earlier
Would Fre
Op 10-8-2011 9:08, Eduardo Casino schreef:
> http://sites.google.com/site/chitchatvmback/
ah so that's where Ken Kato went with his site, was already missing that
for a while to read up about all those commandline utilities he had.
Hi Eduardo,
>> Even VMWare has open source mouse and X drivers around:
>>
>> www.vmware.com/resources/opensource/projects.html#c53533
>>
>> vmmouse.c is "only" 1350 lines, the graphics driver has
>> circa 250 kilobytes of sources in their 11.0.3 version...
> There is also an unofficial implement
2011/8/10 Eric Auer :
> Even VMWare has open source mouse and X drivers around:
>
> www.vmware.com/resources/opensource/projects.html#c53533
>
> vmmouse.c is "only" 1350 lines, the graphics driver has
> circa 250 kilobytes of sources in their 11.0.3 version,
> you can download the sources as zip/tg
Hi Mike,
> Ultimately we're going to need to have DOS device drivers that know how
> to interact with the various VMs...
Only for two reasons:
- the simulated hardware of the VM is "broken" so that
normal drivers for the corresponding real hardware
after which the simulation was modelled w
In a not so long ago job assignment I spent a little time learning the
innards of KVM, qemu, and virtualization technology in general.
The virtualization environments are going to do a good job running your
instructions on real hardware. All modern hardware has support for
doing this, sometim
Op 9-8-2011 20:30, Ralf A. Quint schreef:
> But a VM is not (real) "hardware"!
> And if a certain VM doesn't support to emulate hardware in a way that
> (Free)DOS runs without an issue, I seriously fail to see how FreeDOS
> can possibly do anything about it.
There's been a few examples already of
At 10:33 AM 8/9/2011, Eric Auer wrote:
>Hi Bernd, Jeremy,
>
>different virtual PCs seem to have different issues, but
>they are all useable and I am quite sure that users run
>Linux and Windows inside them without real problems. Why
>should we have to tell DOS users that only a certain and
>small
10 matches
Mail list logo
