On Fri, 30 Dec 2016, Ralf Quint wrote:
> On 12/30/2016 6:57 AM, Steve Nickolas wrote:
>> *I* did it, but that was many years ago. I do remember the VDM didn't
>> work.
> What I remember (granted, getting old LOL) was that someone had 3.0
> starting but then couldn't do much beyond that. Not
On 12/30/2016 6:57 AM, Steve Nickolas wrote:
> *I* did it, but that was many years ago. I do remember the VDM didn't
> work.
What I remember (granted, getting old LOL) was that someone had 3.0
starting but then couldn't do much beyond that. Not aware that anyone
every got it working (beyond a
> Maybe I'm
> the wrong one to still be talking about this since I don't know the
> gory details.
yep.
Tom
--
Check out the vibrant tech community on one of the world's most
engaging tech sites, SlashDot.org!
> There is no MS-DOS 7, despite what people are trying to tell. That
> "Boot part" if Windows 9x will identify itself as DOS version 7,
> but never was a standalone version of DOS.
Actually, with a little bit of tweaking, it can be -- I do it all of the time.
The two main things you need to do
Hi,
On Thu, Dec 29, 2016 at 6:00 PM, Jose Antonio Senna
wrote:
> Rugxulo said:
>
>> On Tue, Dec 27, 2016 at 6:16 PM, Jose Antonio Senna
>> wrote:
>
>>> I booted FreeDOS kernel 2042 from a floppy in a W98SE
>>> machine,
On Fri, 30 Dec 2016, Ralf Quint wrote:
> On 12/29/2016 8:52 PM, Steve Nickolas wrote:
>>
>>> NO version of Windows will start from FreeDOS, not 3.x nor any 9x...
>> I know 3.1 did in the past, with provisos, did that regress?
> Sorry but I am not aware that anyone has successfully been able to
On 12/29/2016 8:52 PM, Steve Nickolas wrote:
>
>> NO version of Windows will start from FreeDOS, not 3.x nor any 9x...
> I know 3.1 did in the past, with provisos, did that regress?
Sorry but I am not aware that anyone has successfully been able to do
that...
>
>> There is no MS-DOS 7, despite