Re: [Freedos-devel] FreeDOS Runtime

2024-05-02 Thread Vacek Nules via Freedos-devel
Hello Jim, I am a native Hungarian speaker (despite bearing a first name of Slavic origin). If you need help in translating anything to Hungarian, just tell me, I'll gladly help Regards, Vacek Jim Hall via Freedos-devel ezt írta (időpont: 2024. máj. 3., Pén 2:05): > Good "netiquette" is to

Re: [Freedos-devel] FreeDOS Runtime

2024-05-02 Thread Jim Hall via Freedos-devel
Good "netiquette" is to only discuss one topic per email thread, so I started a new thread for Runtime: On Thu, May 2, 2024 at 4:12 PM Eric Auer via Freedos-devel wrote: [..] > *Runtime* > > Jim's version is a small C program, 120 lines, using catgets > for messages which can be translated in

Re: [Freedos-devel] FreeDOS Terminal

2024-05-02 Thread Jim Hall via Freedos-devel
Good "netiquette" is to only discuss one topic per email thread, so I started a new thread for Terminal: On Thu, May 2, 2024 at 4:12 PM Eric Auer via Freedos-devel wrote: > Willi has asked Jerome and me whether RUNTIME and TERMINAL > in the auersoft.eu versions were real updates or just tests.

[Freedos-devel] freedos runtime and terminal updates and alternatives

2024-05-02 Thread Eric Auer via Freedos-devel
Hi! Willi has asked Jerome and me whether RUNTIME and TERMINAL in the auersoft.eu versions were real updates or just tests. Jerome asked him to ask on the LIST, so I answer HERE ;-) *Runtime* Jim's version is a small C program, 120 lines, using catgets for messages which can be translated

Re: [Freedos-devel] MS-DOS 4.0 source released as open source under MIT license

2024-05-02 Thread Steve Nickolas via Freedos-devel
On Thu, 2 May 2024, Liam Proven via Freedos-devel wrote: On Fri, 26 Apr 2024 at 08:25, Steve Nickolas via Freedos-devel wrote: Everything but himem, dosshell, gwbasic, and parts of xmaem/xma2ems, apparently. I got most of it compiled using the tools in the archive. That being the case, is

Re: [Freedos-devel] MS-DOS 4.0 source released as open source under MIT license

2024-05-02 Thread Liam Proven via Freedos-devel
On Fri, 26 Apr 2024 at 08:25, Steve Nickolas via Freedos-devel wrote: > Everything but himem, dosshell, gwbasic, and parts of xmaem/xma2ems, > apparently. I got most of it compiled using the tools in the archive. That being the case, is it possible to get it working with 386MAX instead, as

Re: [Freedos-devel] MS-DOS 4.0 source released as open source under MIT license

2024-05-02 Thread Steve Nickolas via Freedos-devel
On Thu, 2 May 2024, Eric Auer via Freedos-devel wrote: Hi! I have no life - I can devote the time and energy to it, just don't have the brainpower I'd like to think I have. I hope that will get better :-o Eric Well, I certainly know more about C, 8088 ASM, and MS-DOS than I did going

Re: [Freedos-devel] MS-DOS 4.0 source released as open source under MIT license

2024-05-02 Thread Eric Auer via Freedos-devel
Hi! I have no life - I can devote the time and energy to it, just don't have the brainpower I'd like to think I have. I hope that will get better :-o Eric ___ Freedos-devel mailing list Freedos-devel@lists.sourceforge.net

Re: [Freedos-devel] MBR boot failure + diagnosis on a PhoenixBIOS 4.0 Release 6.0 machine

2024-05-02 Thread Eric Auer via Freedos-devel
Hi Bernd, /LOADMBR restores the whole sector. Does anyone think this is a major issue? In that case, I think loadmbr should never be used except when there was a previous corresponding savembr. Because using loadmbr in another way results in deleting the whole partition table and/or