MUX-AE (Re: [Freedos-devel] ANNOUNCE: FD APPEND 1.0)

2004-06-02 Thread Steffen Kaiser
On Mon, 24 May 2004, Eduardo Casino wrote: Hello Eduardo, Steffen Kaiser wrote: intercepted and executed by this hook. FreeCOM supports this mecanism, although in a slightly different (read incompatible) way than COMMAND.COM. what has to be changed in order to make FreeCOM compatible? I got your

Re: MUX-AE (Re: [Freedos-devel] ANNOUNCE: FD APPEND 1.0)

2004-06-02 Thread Eduardo Casino
I tried to ask MS DOS 6 about enlightment and discovered the very problem I had last time, too, I meddled with MUX-AE: Regardless of how I change either the command or argument buffer, DOS 6 always reacts with drive not ready. Hmmm... I've encountered no problems with DOS 6 at

Re: [Freedos-devel] ANNOUNCE: FD APPEND 1.0

2004-05-25 Thread Aitor Santamaría Merino
Arkady V.Belousov escribi: Hi! 24--2004 10:12 [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Aitor Santamar?a Merino) wrote to [EMAIL PROTECTED]: ASM See for example the flags (B706h to get, B707h to set, both through BX): Where see? Which interrupt function? ASM 2Fh You mean: BX=0, AX=B706, INT 2F,

Re: [Freedos-devel] ANNOUNCE: FD APPEND 1.0

2004-05-25 Thread Eduardo Casino
Steffen Kaiser wrote: intercepted and executed by this hook. FreeCOM supports this mecanism, although in a slightly different (read incompatible) way than COMMAND.COM. Hello Eduardo, what has to be changed in order to make FreeCOM compatible? Hi Steffen, FreeCOM blank-pads the

Re: [Freedos-devel] ANNOUNCE: FD APPEND 1.0

2004-05-24 Thread Steffen Kaiser
On Sat, 22 May 2004, Eduardo Casino Almao wrote: Aitor wrote: (b) If you check RBIL, Int 2F/AX=AE01h it says that APPEND hooks this intercepted and executed by this hook. FreeCOM supports this mecanism, although in a slightly different (read incompatible) way than COMMAND.COM. Hello

Re: [Freedos-devel] ANNOUNCE: FD APPEND 1.0

2004-05-24 Thread Aitor Santamaría Merino
Arkady V.Belousov escribi: How to overcome presence of APPEND? I mean, APPENDed names, probably, may/should be ignored by ATTRIB? ASM APPEND will hook File Open, and with the /X modifier, also FindFirst and ASM Exec. ASM See for example the flags (B706h to get, B707h to set, both through

Re: [Freedos-devel] ANNOUNCE: FD APPEND 1.0

2004-05-24 Thread Arkady V.Belousov
Hi! 24--2004 10:12 [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Aitor Santamar?a Merino) wrote to [EMAIL PROTECTED]: ASM See for example the flags (B706h to get, B707h to set, both through BX): Where see? Which interrupt function? ASM 2Fh You mean: BX=0, AX=B706, INT 2F, append_state = BX if (BX 1) /* APPEND

Re: [Freedos-devel] ANNOUNCE: FD APPEND 1.0

2004-05-23 Thread Arkady V.Belousov
Hi! 21--2004 21:54 [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Alain) wrote to [EMAIL PROTECTED]: How to overcome presence of APPEND? I mean, APPENDed names, probably, may/should be ignored by ATTRIB? A I believe that attrib uses findfirst/findnext Our attrib - yes. A that is not affected, and append

Re: [Freedos-devel] ANNOUNCE: FD APPEND 1.0

2004-05-23 Thread Arkady V.Belousov
Hi! 22--2004 12:18 [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Aitor Santamar?a Merino) wrote to [EMAIL PROTECTED]: How to overcome presence of APPEND? I mean, APPENDed names, probably, may/should be ignored by ATTRIB? ASM APPEND will hook File Open, and with the /X modifier, also FindFirst and ASM Exec. ASM See

Re: [Freedos-devel] ANNOUNCE: FD APPEND 1.0

2004-05-22 Thread Aitor Santamaría Merino
Hi, Arkady V.Belousov escribi: Hi! 21--2004 23:07 [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Aitor Santamara Merino) wrote to [EMAIL PROTECTED]: ASM I mention this of backdoors in particular because: ASM (a) MS-DOS 6.22 help does say that COMMAND's DIR is not affected by ASM APPEND /X. FreeCOM DIR is not affected by

Re: [Freedos-devel] ANNOUNCE: FD APPEND 1.0

2004-05-22 Thread Eduardo Casino Almao
Aitor wrote: (b) If you check RBIL, Int 2F/AX=AE01h it says that APPEND hooks this call, and not just APPEND USES this call (as could be used to SET APPEND= in APPEND /E, for example). I haven't hooked this call, I don't know exactly why to hook this. MS Append hooks this

Re: [Freedos-devel] ANNOUNCE: FD APPEND 1.0

2004-05-21 Thread Alain
Hi Aitor, Can I use this append with MS-DOS or in Win98se dos-box? thanks for this, Alain Aitor Santamaría Merino escreveu: Hi all, I'd like to announce FreeDOS APPEND 1.0, a very basic APPEND that I have created. With this, I could run WordStar Express in a mixed directory installation, as I

Re: [Freedos-devel] ANNOUNCE: FD APPEND 1.0

2004-05-21 Thread Aitor Santamaría Merino
Hi Alain, Alain escribió: Hi Aitor, Can I use this append with MS-DOS or in Win98se dos-box? MS-DOS: In theory, unless there is a backdoor somewhere, this APPEND is implemented following RBIL and MS-DOS 6.22 help (except that the functions mentioned are not implemented, but I doubt that you have

Re: [Freedos-devel] ANNOUNCE: FD APPEND 1.0

2004-05-21 Thread Arkady V.Belousov
Hi! 21--2004 23:07 [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Aitor Santamara Merino) wrote to [EMAIL PROTECTED]: ASM I mention this of backdoors in particular because: ASM (a) MS-DOS 6.22 help does say that COMMAND's DIR is not affected by ASM APPEND /X. FreeCOM DIR is not affected by FD-APPEND /X, even with no ASM

Re: [Freedos-devel] ANNOUNCE: FD APPEND 1.0

2004-05-21 Thread Alain
Arkady V.Belousov escreveu: Hi! 21--2004 23:07 [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Aitor Santamara Merino) wrote to [EMAIL PROTECTED]: ASM I mention this of backdoors in particular because: ASM (a) MS-DOS 6.22 help does say that COMMAND's DIR is not affected by ASM APPEND /X. FreeCOM DIR is not affected by

[Freedos-devel] ANNOUNCE: FD APPEND 1.0

2004-05-20 Thread Aitor Santamaría Merino
Hi all, I'd like to announce FreeDOS APPEND 1.0, a very basic APPEND that I have created. With this, I could run WordStar Express in a mixed directory installation, as I intended. APPEND 1.0 is very basic. In particular, it is NOT implemented: - APPEND /E - FCB functions - The function 11 of the