Hi!
25--2004 21:06 [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Alain) wrote to
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:
A BTW: do you have information about memcpy() problems in BC 3.1 ? Last
Probably, memcpy() contains same bug. Which one you mean?
A I mean mamcpy(),
I mean: which one _bug_ you mean?
A but I will check it it could
Hi,
Alain wrote:
[...]
BTW: do you have information about memcpy() problems in BC 3.1 ? Last
week I had a very hard to trace bug (in a TSR) that was solved replacing
it with memmove(). Andreas sayd that he had problems with it too.
Are you sure the two buffers you are memcpy-ing don't overlap?
Hi!
25--2004 22:53 [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Gregory Pietsch) wrote to
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:
A BTW: do you have information about memcpy() problems in BC 3.1 ? Last
My BC bugs list contains:
- Result of intrinsic-version of memcmp function undefined when third
^
Hi!
26--2004 08:55 [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Roberto Mariottini)
wrote to [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
BTW: do you have information about memcpy() problems in BC 3.1 ? Last
week I had a very hard to trace bug (in a TSR) that was solved replacing
it with memmove(). Andreas sayd that he had problems with it
Alain wrote:
Arkady V.Belousov escreveu:
A BTW: do you have information about memcpy() problems in BC 3.1 ? Last
My BC bugs list contains:
- Result of intrinsic-version of memcmp function undefined when third
argument is zero.
FIX: check size of compared memory blocks before memcmp.
Hi!
23--2004 12:41 [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Alain) wrote to
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:
A PS: FWIU the later Borland museum compiler is BC1 that was released
All see your mentions, but TCPP1 is very buggy and outdated beast,
which better not to use.
A ?? I said BC and not TC ?? Please confirm this is
Gregory Pietsch escreveu:
Why would development of FreeDOS utilities be forbidden? Nobody is
requiring that anyone actually use TC 2.01 or TC++ 1.02. As long as the
written code is portable, it should work with any compiler. ;-)
If the licence says for personal use only or something like that,
Arkady V.Belousov escreveu:
Hi!
22--2004 21:24 [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Alain) wrote to
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:
A PS: FWIU the later Borland museum compiler is BC1 that was released
A _after_ TC2, but for mistirious reasons I posted this many-many times
A and I fell into a some void.
All see your
Hi!
21--2004 23:46 [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Koder) wrote to
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:
K OpenWatcom, of course!! How could I forget! I just passed there a moth ago,
K thinking it was a nice thing to open up Watcom C++. But does it also do
K 16bit exe's?
Yes. Unfortunately, this is only modern compiler
Only TC 2.01 and TC++ 1.02 are free. And OpenWatcom! Quite big but seems
to be quite powerful as well.
...
And note: TC/TC++ are free as in beer (zero cost.) But they are not
free as in speech - source code is not available.
IMHO it is not free. it says only for Personal Use. This makes
Alain wrote:
Only TC 2.01 and TC++ 1.02 are free. And OpenWatcom! Quite big but
seems
to be quite powerful as well.
...
And note: TC/TC++ are free as in beer (zero cost.) But they are not
free as in speech - source code is not available.
IMHO it is not free. it says only for Personal Use. This
Hi!
22--2004 21:24 [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Alain) wrote to
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:
A PS: FWIU the later Borland museum compiler is BC1 that was released
A _after_ TC2, but for mistirious reasons I posted this many-many times
A and I fell into a some void.
All see your mentions, but TCPP1 is very
Hi!
1) If I were to write a FreeDOS-targetted application on FreeDOS, which C++
compiler would be the most interesting? I have a copy of TC++ 3.0 lying
around somewhere. Is that one freely available yet?
Only TC 2.01 and TC++ 1.02 are free. And OpenWatcom! Quite big but seems
to be quite
Eric Auer wrote:
Hi!
1) If I were to write a FreeDOS-targetted application on FreeDOS, which C++
compiler would be the most interesting? I have a copy of TC++ 3.0 lying
around somewhere. Is that one freely available yet?
Only TC 2.01 and TC++ 1.02 are free. And OpenWatcom! Quite big but seems
to
14 matches
Mail list logo
