Hi Jim,
while I agree that more and more software is creeping into
the distro if we add all interesting things, this list
is still somewhat comparable to full 1.0. Yet already 1.0
had exactly the creep problem that you describe. So first
we should indeed get a more basic 1.1 ready before we can
Hi again Rugxulo,
So VMware needs PCNET? VirtualBox needs AMDPD? QEMU needs NE2000?
Anybody know BOCHS? (Yes, I'm assuming more re: emulation than real
hardware here, isn't that reasonable?)
Bochs emulates a bad(?) NE2000 and a nonstandard PCI Pseudo NIC
for which an Etherboot driver exists
Most attractive to average users (rough guess):
Mpxplay
Bret's USB
CuteMouse
mTCP + common packet drivers
Arachne
WGET
Mined
GNU Emacs
Perl
Python
OpenGem
OpenWatcom + NASM
FreeDoom + Eternity Engine
HXRT + HXGUI
p7zip
DJGPP (GCC + GPP + Watt-32)
UIDE + XMGR + RDISK + SHCDX33E
Hi,
On 7/17/11, Jim Hall jh...@freedos.org wrote:
Most attractive to average users (rough guess):
While I'm glad to see enthusiasm for what the next FreeDOS distro
should include, and you've got a lot of interesting stuff above, I'll
point out that this is a classic example of scope creep.
Op 17-7-2011 23:23, Rugxulo schreef:
This was merely an exercise at naming popular, i.e. heavily-desired,
apps that most common users might probably want. It is not intended to
reflect my own goofy needs.
And besides, most of these already were in FD 1.0, so nyah. ;-)
For a full CD it's
Hi,
On 7/17/11, Bernd Blaauw bbla...@home.nl wrote:
Op 17-7-2011 23:23, Rugxulo schreef:
This was merely an exercise at naming popular, i.e. heavily-desired,
apps that most common users might probably want. It is not intended to
reflect my own goofy needs.
And besides, most of these already
On 7/15/2011 11:33 AM, Bernd Blaauw wrote:
Op 15-7-2011 5:08, Michael B. Brutman schreef:
- How do I use the new installer that Jim has been working on?
It's in the new ISO that I plan to upload by Sunday evening. Still need
to work out some things to make it a smoother experience. The initial
Op 16-7-2011 16:30, Michael B. Brutman schreef:
Good - I await the next revision. I'm trying to do my part here by
testing it ..
great, thanks.
On all of my machines (DOS, Windows and Unix) I try to keep the optional
packages separate from the core OS functions. So DOS will live in /DOS
Hi,
On 7/16/11, Bernd Blaauw bbla...@home.nl wrote:
Op 16-7-2011 16:30, Michael B. Brutman schreef:
Does this mean that they will be put on the CD later, or that the user
has to find a different way to get them on the machine? I think that
every packet driver known to man probably fits
Hi Mike,
- Are all of the binaries always put into the one bin dir? I expected
Yes, like with Linux. Also remember that DOS often has
small environment variable space, so we keep PATH short
and have no opt or usr local ;-) However, FreeDOS
1.0 did have a few packages using further
Some general questions and comments from a newbie:
- How do I use the new installer that Jim has been working on?
The new Install isn't in the first 1.1 test release. Look for it in the next
test distro, if Bernd decides it is okay for testing.
Op 15-7-2011 5:08, Michael B. Brutman schreef:
- How do I use the new installer that Jim has been working on?
It's in the new ISO that I plan to upload by Sunday evening. Still need
to work out some things to make it a smoother experience. The initial
menu showing which CD drives were found
On Fri, 15 Jul 2011, Bernd Blaauw wrote:
See above, minimising things. WATTCP programs are usually compiled as
DJGPP programs, having kind of huge disk footprint compared to your
drivers for example.
The Watt32 libs are pretty big. The regular WatTCP is a lot smaller and
16-bit Internet
I just took my first pass at installing 1.1 using the ISO image that
Bernd Blaauw provided a few days ago. I got it done, but it was not
without a few problems. I'll assume those are user errors until I can
prove otherwise.
Some general questions and comments from a newbie:
- How do I use
14 matches
Mail list logo