Hi,
> Here it is (w/ srcs and one-byte diff):
>
> https://sites.google.com/site/rugxulo/XFDISK.ZIP?attredirects=0&d=1
Nice size for a patch ;-)
>> As for UPX terms, I could try LZMA and Ultra Brute settings indeed,
>> but
>> wonder what effect (decompression possible at all? loading times?
>>
Op 30-7-2011 15:29, dos386 schreef:
> Got the answer ???
>
> - LZMA decompressible on 8086: YES
> - LZMA vs NRV/UCL: LZMA (much?) slower decompression
> - Ultra-Brutal-Effect: much slower compression,
>no performance penalty on decompression (?)
I did a quick test here by looking if UPX --ultr
Hi,
On Sat, Jul 30, 2011 at 6:54 AM, Bernd Blaauw wrote:
>
> Mailing me an uncompressed adjusted binary is welcome.
Here it is (w/ srcs and one-byte diff):
https://sites.google.com/site/rugxulo/XFDISK.ZIP?attredirects=0&d=1
> As for UPX terms, I could try LZMA and Ultra Brute settings indeed,
Op 30-7-2011 15:29, dos386 schreef:
>> I tested UPX on one of the slowest machines that I have that has a hard
>> drive. On a PCjr with a NEC V20 and XT-IDE adapter UPX compressed
>> executables worked, but they took noticeably longer to start up:
>> FTPSRV: original was 2 seconds, with UPX is 5 s
PS: I really prefer binaries NON-UPX'ed
--
~~~ wow ~~~
--
Got Input? Slashdot Needs You.
Take our quick survey online. Come on, we don't ask for help often.
Plus, you'll get a chance to win $100 to spend on ThinkGeek
> As for UPX terms, I could try LZMA and Ultra Brute settings indeed, but
> wonder what effect (decompression possible at all? loading times? memory
> uses? does resulting binary work?) they have on ancient machines.
2011-07-11 Michael B. Brutman wrote:
> I tested UPX on one of the slowest machi
Op 30-7-2011 1:57, Rugxulo schreef:
> Hi, I found a 1 byte patch to make xfdisk UPXable :-)
> Use a hex editor and change the byte at fba0 from 75 to eb:
>
> 000fb90: 009a c20e 7310 bfee 051e 57e8 0b5a 08c0
> 000fba0: eb28 bf08 0d1e 579a 4008 7310 bf08 0d1e
> -** done :-)
> 000fbb0: 57bf 92
Hi again,
On Fri, Jul 29, 2011 at 4:01 PM, Rugxulo wrote:
>
>> UPX is convenient to have around indeed, if space limited. The
>> bugreports showed that the extra FDISK utility included in FreeDOS
>> doesn't like UPX due to a file checksum (integrity test) being done
>> before running.
>
> XFDISK?
