Hi,
On Sat, Jul 23, 2011 at 4:05 PM, Ralf A. Quint free...@gmx.net wrote:
If the development of FreeDOS keeps sticking to it's original goal of
providing a complete, free, 100% MS-DOS compatible operating system
(http://www.freedos.org/freedos/about/), then the focus should be on
exactly
Hi,
I recognize your name from random posts, but I can't place it.
Well, just saying, you must be valuable (in general)! ;-)
On Fri, Jul 22, 2011 at 7:53 PM, Ralf A. Quint free...@gmx.net wrote:
The current 3.0 sources have a dos-make.exe file in the archive,
don't know if that is
On Sat, 23 Jul 2011, Rugxulo wrote:
Hmmm? Where'd you hear that? Dumping stuff that isn't 64-bit?
Personally I have my own theories and wouldn't be too surprised, but
I'm not sure that's the truth. We'll probably see a 32-bit version of
Win8, but by 9 they'll probably dump it (blind guess).
--- On Fri, 7/22/11, Ralf A. Quint free...@gmx.net wrote:
as you folks all are abandoning DOS more or less
The assumption appears to be that every DOS program ever written is DOS. This
is a fallacy. DOS is just the kernel and command processor; usually a few
utilities are included to make the
At 12:05 AM 7/23/2011, Rugxulo wrote:
Hi,
I recognize your name from random posts, but I can't place it.
Well, just saying, you must be valuable (in general)! ;-)
Well, the later must be a matter of opinion, seems some folks don't
like critical remarks from people rather sticking to the
At 06:00 AM 7/23/2011, Walt Nagel wrote:
--- On Fri, 7/22/11, Ralf A. Quint free...@gmx.net wrote:
as you folks all are abandoning DOS more or less
The assumption appears to be that every DOS program ever written is
DOS. This is a fallacy. DOS is just the kernel and command
processor; usually
On Sat, 23 Jul 2011, Ralf A. Quint wrote:
If the development of FreeDOS keeps sticking to it's original goal of
providing a complete, free, 100% MS-DOS compatible operating system
(http://www.freedos.org/freedos/about/), then the focus should be on
exactly that.
Quoted for truth.
And then
Op 23-7-2011 23:05, Ralf A. Quint schreef:
If the development of FreeDOS keeps sticking to it's original goal of
providing a complete, free, 100% MS-DOS compatible operating system
(http://www.freedos.org/freedos/about/), then the focus should be on
exactly that.
Still agreeing to that goal,
I am updating the 'devel' side of the FreeDOS software list, and
cannot find any DOS binaries for xHarbour. Can anyone help me? I also
need corresponding source code.
The upstream web site no longer points to DOS binaries:
http://www.xharbour.org/index.asp?page=download/dos/binaries_dos
The old
At 04:51 PM 7/22/2011, Jim Hall wrote:
I am updating the 'devel' side of the FreeDOS software list, and
cannot find any DOS binaries for xHarbour. Can anyone help me? I also
need corresponding source code.
The upstream web site no longer points to DOS binaries:
Hi,
On Fri, Jul 22, 2011 at 6:51 PM, Jim Hall jh...@freedos.org wrote:
I am updating the 'devel' side of the FreeDOS software list, and
cannot find any DOS binaries for xHarbour. Can anyone help me? I also
need corresponding source code.
I've never used xHarbour or xBASE or MS Clipper. I
11 matches
Mail list logo
