Re: [Freedos-devel] Why unzip now requires a 386?

Hi guys, BTW, Unzip hasn't had a proper release since 2009 (AFAIK). No, it hasn't. I was halfway implying that FreeDOS wasn't necessarily incompetent here, that it just hasn't changed much upstream since then. Hence there's really nothing "new" to ship. I know, there really is nothing we

Re: [Freedos-devel] Why unzip now requires a 386?

Hi, On Tue, Jan 10, 2017 at 4:58 AM, Joe Forster/STA wrote: > >> BTW, Unzip hasn't had a proper release since 2009 (AFAIK). > > No, it hasn't. I was halfway implying that FreeDOS wasn't necessarily incompetent here, that it just hasn't changed much upstream since then. Hence

Re: [Freedos-devel] Why unzip now requires a 386?

Hi, On Mon, Jan 9, 2017 at 4:15 PM, Eric Auer wrote: > > The 16 bit unzip is probably quite limited in performance > and the range of files which it can unzip, but that is only > a guess... BTW, Unzip hasn't had a proper release since 2009 (AFAIK). So, if you're desperate

Re: [Freedos-devel] Why unzip now requires a 386?

Hi sparky4, > this is most annoying i cannot do my usual file transfer with the > freedos 1.2 unzip! gah!! why!? The 16 bit unzip is probably quite limited in performance and the range of files which it can unzip, but that is only a guess... I do wonder how you installed FreeDOS 1.2 on a

[Freedos-devel] Why unzip now requires a 386?

this is most annoying i cannot do my usual file transfer with the freedos 1.2 unzip! gah!! why!? -- View this message in context: http://freedos.10956.n7.nabble.com/Why-unzip-now-requires-a-386-tp25809.html Sent from the FreeDOS - Dev mailing list archive at Nabble.com.