Re: [Freedos-devel] re: More speed test

2005-07-01 Thread Alain
Hi all, Johnson Lam escreveu: Where can I find an explanation about overlap. What is it? I could not understad from the docs what is overlapping with what. The XDMA document have detail information. In short, overlap means XDMA will buffer all output and return to the user's program. If it's

Re: [Freedos-devel] re: More speed test

2005-07-01 Thread Michael Devore
At 10:28 PM 7/1/2005 +0200, Eric Auer wrote: Which can for example mean EMM386 of FreeDOS has slow VDS. But it can also mean something completely different. And has to mean something completely different. EMM386 doesn't support VDS double-buffering, and reports that when queried. There is

Re: [Freedos-devel] re: More speed test

2005-07-01 Thread tom ehlert
Hello Eric, part of the problem. AND Jack, I think the 47 seconds were FREEDOS HIMEM version 3.10, not MS HIMEM. interesting 'I think' WTF is measured ? Talking about every trick in the BOOK, the XMS 3.0 specs explicitly tell that you do NOT have to LOCK XMS handles to use the XMS copy

Re: [Freedos-devel] re: More speed test

2005-07-01 Thread tom ehlert
Hello Alain, That is why I wish that I could move ONLY the buffers to low memory, but as was said here today, this seems too complicated as it is part of the kernel internals BUFFERS= are accessed (and used) only for single sector transfers. and memcpy()'ing them around is MUCH faster then

Re: [Freedos-devel] re: More speed test

2005-07-01 Thread Kenneth J. Davis
... either it's a bug - or it's not if it's a bug, I (speaking generally) might even find it worth fixing ... tom This whole discussion is both interesting and amusing (as are many discussions here...:- ) If you guys do find the cause of the slowdown, and it is fixable, and it is a

[Freedos-devel] re: More speed test

2005-06-30 Thread Eric Auer
Hi Johnson... Thanks to Jack Ellis, he did help me to test HIMEM 3.10 and FDXMS 0.94. Even under MS-DOS the memory manager DO affect hard disk speed... I ran 4 tests unzipping my 2.2-GB zeros file onto my C:... A) FDXMS, no XDMA overlap: 54.0 seconds. C) HIMEM, no XDMA

Re: [Freedos-devel] re: More speed test

2005-06-30 Thread Alain
Eric Auer escreveu: Hi Johnson... Thanks to Jack Ellis, he did help me to test HIMEM 3.10 and FDXMS 0.94. Even under MS-DOS the memory manager DO affect hard disk speed... I ran 4 tests unzipping my 2.2-GB zeros file onto my C:... A) FDXMS, no XDMA overlap: 54.0 seconds. C) HIMEM,

Re: [Freedos-devel] re: More speed test

2005-06-30 Thread Johnson Lam
On Thu, 30 Jun 2005 21:57:33 -0300, you wrote: Hi Alain, Where can I find an explanation about overlap. What is it? I could not understad from the docs what is overlapping with what. The XDMA document have detail information. In short, overlap means XDMA will buffer all output and return to