Hello Arkady,
5. MS-command.com places its (resized) segment with environment right after
itself (original segment preserved not freed), FreeCOM places environment
into UMB, but, as I understand, with LAST_FIT.
I think, (5) should be changed (LAST_FIT to BEST_FIT).
I think (5) should
Hi!
27--2004 15:52 [EMAIL PROTECTED] (tom ehlert) wrote to Arkady V.Belousov
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:
5. MS-command.com places its (resized) segment with environment right after
itself (original segment preserved not freed), FreeCOM places environment
into UMB, but, as I understand, with
Hello Arkady,
5. MS-command.com places its (resized) segment with environment right after
itself (original segment preserved not freed), FreeCOM places environment
into UMB, but, as I understand, with LAST_FIT.
I think, (5) should be changed (LAST_FIT to BEST_FIT).
te I think (5) should
Hi!
27--2004 17:56 [EMAIL PROTECTED] (tom ehlert) wrote to Arkady V.Belousov
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:
In this case memory will be allocated in the _best_ segment (shortest,
which may fit) or after command.com (as with MS-DOS), if there is no
fragmentation.
te one more hint: command.com swaps
Hi!
26--2004 20:35 [EMAIL PROTECTED] (FreeCOM) wrote to
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Ie. applications always get reduced (to size of contents) envrionment
memory block (notwithstanding /E, which affect only command.com' memory)?
F Hmm, Arkady, you fixed yourself a bug (or at least complained about
