Hi,
15.03.2019 4:30, Rugxulo пишет:
Hi, Stas, On Thu, Mar 14, 2019 at 5:56 PM Stas Sergeev
wrote:
As you probably know, once upon a time (like 20 years ago) there were
the command.com sources from Centroid Corp under GPL. AFAIK they were
removed from the freedos servers because of the
Hi, Stas,
On Thu, Mar 14, 2019 at 5:56 PM Stas Sergeev wrote:
>
> As you probably know, once upon a time (like
> 20 years ago) there were the command.com sources
> from Centroid Corp under GPL. AFAIK they were
> removed from the freedos servers because of the
> licence uncertaincy.
I'm not
15.03.2019 2:45, Stas Sergeev пишет:
15.03.2019 2:23, Tom Ehlert пишет:
PLEASE.GO.AWAY. (and stay there for the rest of my life)
I think you are absolutely obtuse if you think I asked
you what I should do.
Because obviously what I wanted to do is to
notify everyone who hosted that code,
whatever your plans with this GPL3 software: there will not be a
place in freedos.
PLEASE.GO.AWAY. (and stay there for the rest of my life)
"Gentlemen, you can't fight in here! This Is the War Room!"
--
https://github.com/tkchia
___
15.03.2019 2:23, Tom Ehlert пишет:
FreeDOS is NOT the kitchen sink where to dump 20 years old, buggy
software as long as it has a GPL3 license attached.
Not sure why should I reply to the crap like this,
but here's the proof:
https://sourceforge.net/p/freedos-32/mailman/message/3995210/
---
Hi Stas,
> As you probably know, once upon a time (like
> 20 years ago) there were the command.com sources
> from Centroid Corp under GPL.
I never heard of Centroid. So: no.
> AFAIK they were
> removed from the freedos servers because of the
> licence uncertaincy. I used them in my comcom32
>
