Hi,
On Mon, May 22, 2023 at 11:04 AM wrote:
> > On May 22, 2023, at 7:03 AM, Rugxulo wrote:
> > On Mon, May 15, 2023 at 6:48 PM wrote:
> >>
> >> Let me show you a MEM print out from my Pentium Pro:
> >>
> >> NANSI3,536(3K) 0(0K) 3,536(3K)
> >> SHSURDRV
Hi,
> On May 22, 2023, at 7:03 AM, Rugxulo wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> On Mon, May 15, 2023 at 6:48 PM wrote:
>>
>> Let me show you a MEM print out from my Pentium Pro:
>>
>> NANSI3,536(3K) 0(0K) 3,536(3K)
>> SHSURDRV 400(0K) 0(0K)
Hi,
On Mon, May 15, 2023 at 6:48 PM wrote:
>
> Let me show you a MEM print out from my Pentium Pro:
>
> NANSI3,536(3K) 0(0K) 3,536(3K)
> SHSURDRV 400(0K) 0(0K)400(0K)
> LBACACHE10,576 (10K) 0(0K)
> This could look something like this. The system boots as normal. A CONFIG
> option like ‘DOSMOVE=UMB’ could exist.
there exists already the DOS=UMB option, meaning "move as much as possible to
UMB".
IIRC when Bart implemented this he only moved DATA (buffers, LASTDRIVE=,
current
Hi,
> On May 16, 2023, at 8:43 PM, Bret Johnson wrote:
>
>>> But mostly, I think it would look really cool to have all Zeros in
>>> the Conventional Memory Column.
>
>> I think this would be an exercise in futility. After all, there are
>> parts of the kernel, which are the first part of
>> But mostly, I think it would look really cool to have all Zeros in
>> the Conventional Memory Column.
> I think this would be an exercise in futility. After all, there are
> parts of the kernel, which are the first part of (Free)DOS being
> loaded (by the boot code in the MBR) and then are
On 5/15/2023 4:46 PM, jer...@shidel.net wrote:
As you can see, the only thing in low memory is part of SYSTEM using
nearly 11K.
The machine still has 94K free upper memory and 84K of that is still
in a single large block.
Yes, I know why this is "the way it is" and you don’t need to explain
This is pretty good and matches pretty well with what MDGX/axcel216
has been able to achieve.
MS-DOS 6.22 (https://www.mdgx.com/mem6.htm#M6)
```
Modules using memory below 1 MB:
Name Total = Conventional + Upper Memory
