Re: [Freedos-devel] Intel PRO/1000 driver fails under FreeDOS

2004-05-06 Thread Patrick J. LoPresti
It sounds like you guys managed to figure this out (thanks, Tom!). Can I get a copy of a new kernel to try? When/where? Thanks! - Pat P.S. http://freedos.sourceforge.net/kernel/README.html is inaccessible. --- This SF.Net email is

Re: [Freedos-devel] Intel PRO/1000 driver fails under FreeDOS

2004-05-03 Thread tom ehlert
Bart, Int21/IoControl XYZ -- driver -- Int21/GetVect, Setvect the problem with this is that int28 handlers will now end up on the error stack instead of the disk api stack. So if an int28-TSR such as THELP causes a critical error, the critical error will end up on its own

Re: [Freedos-devel] Intel PRO/1000 driver fails under FreeDOS

2004-05-02 Thread Bart Oldeman
On Sat, 1 May 2004, tom ehlert wrote: Problem: Intel PRO1000 network driver E1000.DOS does Int21/IoControl XYZ -- driver -- Int21/GetVect, Setvect this will reuse the same DOS stack and crash immediately. this issue might be also closed by making GetVect/SetVect true

Re: [Freedos-devel] Intel PRO/1000 driver fails under FreeDOS

2004-05-01 Thread tom ehlert
Now, my users are reporting that the boot disk no longer works on machines which have Intel gigabit (PRO/1000) networking hardware. Problem: Intel PRO1000 network driver E1000.DOS does Int21/IoControl XYZ -- driver -- Int21/GetVect, Setvect this will reuse the same

Re: [Freedos-devel] Intel PRO/1000 driver fails under FreeDOS (MSCLIENT failure)

2004-04-26 Thread Bernd Blaauw
Johnson Lam schreef: I got the same problem when trying MSCLIENT, it does work under FDXXMS+UMBPCI (try it), but fail with HIMEM+EMM386. I'm quite sure the memory manager and hardware not so compatible especially Network Interface Card. try HIMEM + UMBPCI (there's even a 3.57beta7 version at the

Re: [Freedos-devel] Intel PRO/1000 driver fails under FreeDOS (MSCLIENT failure)

2004-04-26 Thread tom ehlert
Hello Johnson, JL I got the same problem when trying MSCLIENT, it does work under JL FDXXMS+UMBPCI (try it), but fail with HIMEM+EMM386. I'm quite sure the JL memory manager and hardware not so compatible especially Network JL Interface Card. Freedos EMM386 doesn't support VDS yet, and NET.EXE

Re: [Freedos-devel] Intel PRO/1000 driver fails under FreeDOS

2004-04-26 Thread Patrick J. LoPresti
Erwin Veermans [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Wild guess: Did you try switches=/E in config.sys? Some people were reporting issues with latest kernel that could be reverted with the /E-switch. Browse this list for more info ... No effect. Also, this happens with both the 2.0.33 and 2.0.34

Re: [Freedos-devel] Intel PRO/1000 driver fails under FreeDOS (MSCLIENT failure)

2004-04-26 Thread Johnson Lam
On Mon, 26 Apr 2004 09:27:31 +0200, you wrote: Hello Tom, try LH /L: NET INIT to force loading of network driver into low memory. Thank you Tom, now the MSCLIENT work, you are really a genius :-) Rgds, Johnson. --- This SF.net email is

Re: [Freedos-devel] Intel PRO/1000 driver fails under FreeDOS

2004-04-25 Thread Patrick J. LoPresti
Michael Devore [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Since you're failing without HIMEM or EMM386 loaded, you have to be hitting a kernel compatibility, agreed? It can't be a UMB conflict or a p-mode conflict or something failing in EMS/XMS/VCPI/DPMI calls. That actually narrows the field of suspects

Re: [Freedos-devel] Intel PRO/1000 driver fails under FreeDOS (MSCLIENT failure)

2004-04-25 Thread Johnson Lam
On 25 Apr 2004 18:10:17 -0400, you wrote: Hi Patrick, With FreeDOS (ke2034_32), it crashes as I described: The driver loads, but when tinyrfc.exe tries to obtain a DHCP lease, it gets an invalid opcode. You report faster than me. I got the same problem when trying MSCLIENT, it does work under