Hello, 2009/6/14 Eric Auer <e.a...@jpberlin.de>: > > Hi Aitor, > >> I support this idea, but that means that odd numbers (2039) would go >> unstable. > > Actually Bart already ported country sys support from unstable, > combining it with built-in country support. He is also working > on f-node free operations in stable. This means that version > 2039 will be the next version of stable.
Ok, I got that (I still have some more mails to read). > I think it also means that we will gradually port more things > from unstable into the stable branch, but have no new unstable > versions (-numbers) to be released in the next few months. It > would be good to update the wiki page about unstable here... > http://sourceforge.net/apps/mediawiki/freedos/index.php?title=Unstable_Kernel_Branch > ...to have a better view on which features are "port-worthy". Good idea, feel free to commit yourself for it... > I agree that the freedos distro should by default include the > stable branch of the kernel :-). Note that the discussion in > mid-may was about experimental filesystems. I still think it > would be better to play with those only in the unstable branch. > > That branch can serve as testing ground for experimental things > and as a pool for carefully (!) porting features into stable. > Of course it would be useful to port some updates from stable > to unstable first, to make the unstable branch more useable. Good. But then my question is: how is unstable versioning going to be handled? Aitor ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Crystal Reports - New Free Runtime and 30 Day Trial Check out the new simplified licensing option that enables unlimited royalty-free distribution of the report engine for externally facing server and web deployment. http://p.sf.net/sfu/businessobjects _______________________________________________ Freedos-kernel mailing list Freedos-kernel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/freedos-kernel
