Re: [Freedos-kernel] [Freedos-user] was: Windows 3.1 - Pending kernel patches 2037/2038

2009-09-04 Thread Aitor Santamaría
Ooops, true, I have mistaken both lists, thanks Eric! Aitor 2009/9/4 Eric Auer e.a...@jpberlin.de: Hi Aitor, 2009/4/26 Christian Masloch c...@bttr-software.de: Examples: - handling of floppy before disk is inserted / unformatted partitions - initdisk CHS geometry fix and BSS init fix

Re: [Freedos-kernel] kernel 2038 discussion stuck? history.txt changes

2009-09-01 Thread Aitor Santamaría
Hello Bart, I added the hook... very sorry about this delay... Aitor 2009/6/5 Bart Oldeman bartolde...@users.sourceforge.net: Hi Eric, 2009/6/5 Eric Auer e.a...@jpberlin.de: Bart seems to work on this a lot, but unfortunately there is nothing about the progress on the mailing list.

Re: [Freedos-kernel] 2039-svn build

2009-07-01 Thread Aitor Santamaría
Hello, 2009/6/27 ibid...@lavabit.com: The hardest part was to find a 16-bit NASM. I have used TurboC because 1 I already have it, 2 OpenWatcom would take too long to download at~78 mb, 3 OW is too large for the 256 mb flash drive I have been booting from Time ago, and if I remember

Re: [Freedos-kernel] [Freedos-user] Thank you to kernel developers for new kernel 2038

2009-07-01 Thread Aitor Santamaría
The kernel files are now mirrored to ibiblio: http://www.ibiblio.org/pub/micro/pc-stuff/freedos/files/dos/kernel/2038/kernel2038-fat16-binary.zip http://www.ibiblio.org/pub/micro/pc-stuff/freedos/files/dos/kernel/2038/kernel2038-fat32-binary.zip

Re: [Freedos-kernel] Hello again

2009-06-16 Thread Aitor Santamaría
Hello, 2009/6/14 Eric Auer e.a...@jpberlin.de: Hi Aitor, I support this idea, but that means that odd numbers (2039) would go unstable. Actually Bart already ported country sys support from unstable, combining it with built-in country support. He is also working on f-node free

Re: [Freedos-kernel] Hello again

2009-06-13 Thread Aitor Santamaría
I support this idea, but that means that odd numbers (2039) would go unstable. I guess that on view on this FD 1.1 should have 2038 ( or 2040 if there's such thing by the release time). Aitor 2009/5/18 Bernd Blaauw bbla...@home.nl: Eric Auer schreef: Still no reason to add experimental things

Re: [Freedos-kernel] Big disk - 500Gb

2008-09-09 Thread Aitor Santamaría
Hello Alain, One question, did you happen to manage how does WinNT perform with such an enlarged FAT system? I'm tired of the fact that I have to either partition or use NTFS (rather problematic if you protect your Documents and settings with password and then windows gets trashed), and it could

Re: [Freedos-kernel] MS Network Client slow performance under FreeDOS

2007-12-27 Thread Aitor Santamaría
Hello, 2007/12/26, Eric Auer [EMAIL PROTECTED]: Hi Marton, CCing the kernel list about this issue... Merry Xmas everybody :-). If I do ANY operation to the disk, say, read a directory for example, I get a PANIC: more than two near fnodes requested at the same time! Hmmm I did not know

Re: [Freedos-kernel] roadmap for freedos kernel 2038

2007-10-28 Thread Aitor Santamaría
Hello, 2007/10/27, Johnson Lam [EMAIL PROTECTED]: On Sat, 27 Oct 2007 07:19:07 +0200, you wrote: Hi Aitor, You're wasting precious time on outdated programs. It might discover one more serious bug. Most people will run Ghost 8 and 2003 on FreeDOS (including me), I don't have a Ghost 5

Re: [Freedos-kernel] roadmap for freedos kernel 2038

2007-10-26 Thread Aitor Santamaría
Hello Johnson, 2007/10/27, Johnson Lam [EMAIL PROTECTED]: On Fri, 26 Oct 2007 15:53:03 +0200 (MEST), you wrote: Dear Developers, 1658 Ghost 5.1 fails: Needs somebody with Ghost 5.1 to fix Please!! Just try Ghost 8.0 and Ghost 2003, if they work don't stick to Ghost 5.1, there MAYBE

Re: [Freedos-kernel] fresh freedos svn kernel updates

2007-07-26 Thread Aitor Santamaría
Hi, 2007/7/23, Bart Oldeman [EMAIL PROTECTED]: Although the ioctl.c restructuring is good, most of the chario.c savings also help. A lot more could be saved in initdisk.c by using the fact that the sector size equals 512 (the DOS code cannot assume that with ram disks etc, but the BIOS code

Re: [Freedos-kernel] re: reload partition table and reassign drive letters

2005-10-19 Thread Aitor Santamaría Merino
Hi, Very very nice discussion, I am enjoying this a lot, thanks! Kenneth J. Davis escribió: various details like that. And really if you wanted to be clever, maintain the needed information about open files and TSRs won't even notice the change, even if the file is now on a different drive

Re: [Freedos-kernel] re: DEVLOAD / ramdisk troubles - or kernel problems?

2005-07-23 Thread Aitor Santamaría Merino
Hi Florian, What is ... supposed to be? Aitor Florian Xaver escribió: Hi! Another idea: Why not including ... ? I am using 4DOS very often, and am happy with it. I mostly don't need more points :-) Bye, Flo --- SF.Net email is

Re: [Freedos-kernel] Re: Analysis: Support for sector sizes != 512 bytes

2005-06-04 Thread Aitor Santamaría Merino
Hi, tom ehlert escribió: Hello Eric, While we are at it, I would suggest a new category not planned at all unless you tell us why it is useful or alternatively send us patches for the list: http://fdos.org/ripcord/fdos_1_0/official/post.htm Bad idea: I unsupport this. If you don't

Re: [Freedos-kernel] Re: test bootdisk

2004-09-15 Thread Aitor Santamaría Merino
Hi, Bernd Blaauw escribió: Bernd Blaauw wrote: Hello all, I've put online a new bootdisk with which I, and you, can easily experiment. Download it from: http://fdos.org/ripcord/beta9-final/test/testing.zip [274KB, 1.44MB unzipped] OK, just uploaded a new version, now includes fixed autoexec.bat

Re: [Freedos-kernel] test bootdisk

2004-09-15 Thread Aitor Santamaría Merino
Hi, Bernd Blaauw escribió: 2) DISPLAY loads low (see MEM /C /P), while plenty of (UMB)memory is available, and being the FIRST driver loaded. very strange! 3) DISPLAY loads high and ATAPICDD/CDRCACHE load low, if removing the REM from MEM /C in the beginning of autoexec.bat You are using

Re: [Freedos-kernel] Re: test bootdisk

2004-09-15 Thread Aitor Santamaría Merino
Bart Oldeman escribió: On Wed, 15 Sep 2004, Bernd Blaauw wrote: Bernd Blaauw wrote: Hello all, I've put online a new bootdisk with which I, and you, can easily experiment. Download it from: http://fdos.org/ripcord/beta9-final/test/testing.zip [274KB, 1.44MB unzipped] OK, just

Re: [Freedos-kernel] Re: test bootdisk

2004-09-15 Thread Aitor Santamaría Merino
Bernd Blaauw escribió: no idea if the DISPLAY binary has been UPX'd, and if that has any affect. UPX first, COM2EXE next, produces smallest size. I'm still confused by syntax for DISPLAY/MODE/KEYB.., so it's good to have working examples at hand. I think what you are using is ok. It's equal than

Re: [Freedos-kernel] re: test bootdisk

2004-09-15 Thread Aitor Santamaría Merino
Hi, Eric Auer escribió: About DISPLAY: UPX first, COM2EXE next, produces smallest size. bad idea. COM2EXE cannot detect de-UPX-ed size! So the exe header will tell how much space the compressed COM needs. But the whole idea of using COM2EXE was to let DOS know the de-UPX-ed size

Re: [Freedos-kernel] Lucho gives up arguing with Arkady

2004-09-14 Thread Aitor Santamaría Merino
Alain escribió: Lucho, you introduce change in interface. _Such_ actions necessarily _must_ be discussed and approved. By whom? By the Boss? Who is the Boss? Arkady? Hi Lucho, don't feel hurt, he is just sayint what we yelled at him so many times :) The boss is ... gess who? the comunity,

Re: [Freedos-kernel] Review on kernel files, some questions

2004-08-23 Thread Aitor Santamaría Merino
Hi, I just have to say: many thanks for your reply. Bart Oldeman escribió: (5) By the way, strangely enough I don't happen to see 123 - Initdisk anymore, due most probably to the \r before the kernel compatibility. Now I was just wondering who prints FreeDOS kernel version 1.1.35 (Build 2035) [May

Re: [Freedos-kernel] Review on kernel files, some questions

2004-08-23 Thread Aitor Santamaría Merino
tom ehlert escribió: Hello Aitor, I have started watching kernel source files, and trying to understand its logic by reading sources. good luck ;) Thanks as well! (and for reply). Aitor --- SF.Net email is sponsored by

Re: [Freedos-kernel] Getting COUNTRY.SYS done right

2004-08-23 Thread Aitor Santamaría Merino
Eric Auer escribió: As far as I remember, we only have US and German country data around in the kernel - but that might be because the other countries are similar to either of both, and nobody missed explicit support for them yet?? Well, the uppercasing and lowercasing tables for codepage 850

[Freedos-kernel] Review on kernel files, some questions

2004-08-22 Thread Aitor Santamaría Merino
Hi all kernel developers, I have started watching kernel source files, and trying to understand its logic by reading sources. In the study of the files (AT A FIRST GLANCE), I have come across some questions, and further I wonder about some things, and I would like to ask you if you could be so

Re: [Freedos-kernel] Announce: COUNTRY.SYS

2004-08-21 Thread Aitor Santamaría Merino
Hi, tom ehlert escribió: Hello Eduardo, Lucho, Steffen, everybody, we should have some discussion to determine which COUNTRY.SYS format we should use in FreeDOS. 1'st let me state that I never used NLSFUNC, so I may be the wrong person. Well, neither do I because as I never change

Re: [Freedos-kernel] Announce: COUNTRY.SYS

2004-08-21 Thread Aitor Santamaría Merino
don't mind at all if there is a non-compatible format for COUNTRY.SYS (just all the same that MS-MODE won't work with the final FD-DISPLAY.SYS), but I was just trying to find out the (legal) way to get the maximum data with minimum effort. Aitor Bart Oldeman escribió: On Sun, 22 Aug 2004, Aitor

Re: [Freedos-kernel] 2035 findfirst bug: attr a8 treated as 08 if local

2004-08-14 Thread Aitor Santamaría Merino
Hi, Bart Oldeman escribió: ok, that's bit clearer than his email (which was about 10x longer than necessary, but obviously I'm the only one here who thinks that?). No, I also agree. I am back today after some days off. Sorry, Eric, I couldn't read your whole mail, or I would never be able to

Re: [Freedos-kernel] Versions and builds, conservatism

2004-08-07 Thread Aitor Santamaría Merino
Bart Oldeman escribió: By the way, how is Arkady? Has anybody heard of him recently? I begin to worry about him! No idea. A bit silent here indeed. True. Maybe he is on a vacation? Aitor --- This SF.Net email is sponsored by OSTG. Have

Re: [Freedos-kernel] Re: patch: cleanups

2004-07-23 Thread Aitor Santamaría Merino
Hi, Eric Auer escribió: Arkady, Bart, BO -void _seg * KernelAllocPara(size_t nPara, UBYTE type, CStr name, int mode) BO +void _seg * KernelAllocPara(size_t nPara, UBYTE type, const char *name, int BO mode) This is example, how my shortcuts allows to shorter and, thus, more redable lines.

Re: [Freedos-kernel] Re: Kernel bug parade / moving on

2004-06-09 Thread Aitor Santamaría Merino
Eric Auer escribió: Hi Arkady! (Clear high parts of 32bit regs...) How this relates to DOS? MS DOS basically had no 386 stuff at all (except EMM386). In FreeDOS, however, people run 386 aware programs more often. Those leave non-zero values in 32 bit registers when they exit, and the next

Re: [Freedos-kernel] Re: Re: Kernel bug parade / moving on

2004-06-06 Thread Aitor Santamaría Merino
Eric Auer escribió: Hi Justin, thanks for your help offer! Win 3.11 can only run in 386 multitasked mode, 386 ENHANCED mode it would be interesting to get fresh test results (kernel 2035, new himem or maybe ms himem, better no emm386, maybe use DOS=LOW and a non-XMS-Swap FreeCOM for the test as

Re: [Freedos-kernel] [announce] kernel 2035 and bye

2004-05-30 Thread Aitor Santamaría Merino
Hi, It's sad to hear that you say bye, but hopeful to read that you mention at least a break for two months, although I understand your reasons. Could I ask you something before you go? Could you please review bugzilla and try, as far as you understand/know about it, leave the kernel bugs in a

Re: Reference compiler (was Re: [Freedos-kernel] Re: patch: inthndlr.c)

2004-05-10 Thread Aitor Santamaría Merino
Steffen Kaiser escribió: How about to change the reference compiler not only for the kernel, but for all the project? There had been a movement from MASM to NASM already, so this can be reflected here as well. This is missing some documentation as well, right? It would be helpful to have some

Re: [Freedos-kernel] kernel problems and problem loading high DISPLAY

2004-05-04 Thread Aitor Santamaría Merino
Hi, If I understood Eric's point, it might be UPX fault, as it would fail whenever it tries to enlarge the UMB as required by the uncompressed program and silently fails. So I may have to provide uncompressed 64KB DISPLAY.COM in the next release (last before DISPLAY.SYS). On the other hand, in

[Freedos-kernel] FreeDOS Version 1.0 reviewed

2004-04-24 Thread Aitor Santamaría Merino
Hi all, I have commited some changes to the list (some more to go, read below), and I am submitting a message to met you know. In addition, comments are welcome: if you consider that such or such option should be left for post (if any), or which tasks should be there. NOTES: - remember the

Re: [Freedos-kernel] handle 4 defaulting to PRN???

2004-04-05 Thread Aitor Santamaría Merino
Hi Eric, Eric Auer escribió: Hi, in the FAQ, somebody claims that file handle 4 should default to PRN: In my undersanding, handle 4 is stdprn (the other three being stdin, stdout, and stdaux, always using C's notation). So it shoulds sensible that it should point to PRN anyway, isn't it?